Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):151.
doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7.

Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Samantha Teague  1 , George J Youssef  1   2 , Jacqui A Macdonald  1   2   3 , Emma Sciberras  1   2 , Adrian Shatte  4 , Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz  1 , Chris Greenwood  1 , Jennifer McIntosh  1   2 , Craig A Olsson  1   2   3   5 , Delyse Hutchinson  6   7   8   9 ; SEED Lifecourse Sciences Theme
Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Samantha Teague et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Participant retention strategies that minimise attrition in longitudinal cohort studies have evolved considerably in recent years. This study aimed to assess, via systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness of both traditional strategies and contemporary innovations for retention adopted by longitudinal cohort studies in the past decade.

Methods: Health research databases were searched for retention strategies used within longitudinal cohort studies published in the 10-years prior, with 143 eligible longitudinal cohort studies identified (141 articles; sample size range: 30 to 61,895). Details on retention strategies and rates, research designs, and participant demographics were extracted. Meta-analyses of retained proportions were performed to examine the association between cohort retention rate and individual and thematically grouped retention strategies.

Results: Results identified 95 retention strategies, broadly classed as either: barrier-reduction, community-building, follow-up/reminder, or tracing strategies. Forty-four of these strategies had not been identified in previous reviews. Meta-regressions indicated that studies using barrier-reduction strategies retained 10% more of their sample (95%CI [0.13 to 1.08]; p = .01); however, studies using follow-up/reminder strategies lost an additional 10% of their sample (95%CI [- 1.19 to - 0.21]; p = .02). The overall number of strategies employed was not associated with retention.

Conclusions: Employing a larger number of retention strategies may not be associated with improved retention in longitudinal cohort studies, contrary to earlier narrative reviews. Results suggest that strategies that aim to reduce participant burden (e.g., flexibility in data collection methods) might be most effective in maximising cohort retention.

Keywords: Attrition; Cohort; Drop-out; Engagement; Follow-up; Longitudinal; Retention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA procedural flow chart of the search and identification process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Cohort studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
    1. Gustavson K, von Soest T, Karevold E, Røysamb E. Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:918. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-918. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis L, Broome ME, Cox RP. Maximizing retention in community-based clinical trials. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;1:47–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00047.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szklo M. Population-based cohort studies. Epidemiol Rev. 1998;20:81–90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017974. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources