Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):889.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3708-3.

The impact of patient safety culture on handover in rural health facilities

Affiliations

The impact of patient safety culture on handover in rural health facilities

Donella Piper et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Effective handover is crucial for patient safety. Rural health care organisations have particular challenges in relation to handover of information, placing them at higher risk of adverse events. Few studies have examined the relationship between handover and patient safety in rural contexts, particularly in Australia. This study aimed to explore the effect of handover on overall perceptions of patient safety and the effect of other patient safety dimensions on handover in a rural Australian setting.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey using The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was implemented across six rural Local Health Districts in NSW, Australia and resulted in 1587 respondents. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to account for the nested nature of the data. Models were developed to assess the effect of handover on patient safety perceptions, and the effect of other patient safety culture composites on handover variables. Open-ended questions about patient safety were inductively analyzed for themes. Quotes from the handover theme are presented.

Results: All models were significant overall (p < .001), with explanatory powers ranging from 29 to 48%. Within rural health settings, effective handover is significantly related to patient safety perceptions (R2 = .29). A strong teamwork culture and management support culture was found to enhance effective handover of patient information (R2 = .47), and effective handover of personal responsibility (R2 = .37). A strong teamwork, management support, and open communication culture enhances handover of department accountability (R2 = .41). Despite the implementation of standardised communication tools and frameworks for handover, patient safety is compromised by inadequate coordination, poor or absent documentation between departments, between other health care agencies and in transfer of care from acute facilities to primary/community care.

Conclusion: Approaches to handover need to consider the particular challenges associated with rurality and strengthening elements found to be associated with increased safety, such as a strong teamwork and management culture and good reporting practices. Research is required to examine how communication at transition of care, particularly between facilities, is conducted and ways in which to enhance patients' and families' participation.

Keywords: Handover communication; Patient safety; Patient safety culture; Rural health services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The first page of the online survey contained a participant information sheet that explained the study and invited voluntary participation. Potential participants were given the option to consent to complete the questionnaire and by clicking the consent button they were taken to the questionnaire - or not consent, whereupon the questionnaire closed and they were thanked for their time. All questionnaires were anonymous, with no personally identifying information collected. The study received ethics approval from the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee. In addition, site-specific approval was sought and granted from all participating LHDs.

Ethical approval was granted by the Hunter New England Research Ethics Committee.

HNE14/0716/4.03;NSW:HREC/14/HNE/124.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Australia Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare Implementation Toolkit for Clinical Handover Improvement. 2011. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/clinical-communications/clin.... Accessed 25 Sept 2015.
    1. Clark E, Squire S, Heyme A, Mickle MA, Petrie E. The PACT project: improving communication at handover. Med J Aust. 2009;190(11):S125–SS27. - PubMed
    1. Clinical Excellence Commission . Quality System Assessment: 2009 clinical handover data. Sydney: CEC; 2010. p. 6.
    1. Wong MC, Yee KC, Turner P. Clinical handover literature review, eHealth services research group, University of Tasmania Australia: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. 2008.
    1. Manias E, Geddes F, Watson B, Jones D, Della P. Perspectives of clinical handover processes: a multi-site survey across different health professionals. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:80–91. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12986. - DOI - PubMed