Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;23(9):1817-1824.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4045-x. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Stratification of Patient Risk

Affiliations

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Stratification of Patient Risk

Ozgur Akgul et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major cause of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We sought to develop and validate a risk score system that utilized preoperative computed tomography (CT) measurements, laboratory values, and intraoperative pancreatic texture to estimate risk of developing POPF after PD.

Methods: Patients who underwent PD between 2014 and 2017 were identified. Pre- and intraoperative risk factors associated with POPF were identified. Three separate risk models were developed and assessed using multivariable analyses and receiver operating curves.

Results: Among the 150 patients who underwent a PD, mean age was 64 years and the majority of the patients were male (59.3%, n = 89). Overall, the incidence of BL/POPF following PD was 22%. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with POPF included preoperative total serum protein < 6 g/dL (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.04-10.34, p = 0.04), radiologic pancreatic duct diameter (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.97, p = 0.03), intraoperative pancreatic gland texture estimated by surgeon (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.62, p = 0.006), as well as intraoperative pancreatic duct diameter measured by surgeon (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98, p = 0.030). Each risk factor was assigned a weighted score (CT pancreatic duct diameter < 5 mm: 8 points; soft pancreatic gland texture: 5 points; total serum protein < 6 g/dL: 3 points; CT visceral abdominal fat ≥ 230 cm2: 2 points). Patients scoring 4-5 were at low risk of POPF, while patients with a score of 6-18 had a high risk for POPF. The Harrell's c-index for the scoring system was 0.71 (standard error [SD] 0.094) for the training set and 0.67 (SD 0.034) for the test set (with n = 1000 bootstrapping resamples).

Conclusion: A simple risk score for POPF that utilized preoperative radiologic and clinical variables combined with specific intra-operative factors was able to stratify patients relative to POPF risk with good discriminatory ability.

Keywords: Morbidity; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 May;46(5):653-60 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Dec;8(8):951-9 - PubMed
    1. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr 28;11(16):2456-61 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1451-8; discussion 1459 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources