Computerized model for objectively evaluating cutting performance using a laparoscopic box trainer simulator
- PMID: 30478701
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6598-x
Computerized model for objectively evaluating cutting performance using a laparoscopic box trainer simulator
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic box trainer simulator has recently become a tool for assessment of physicians' surgical and laparoscopic skills, and training using such a simulator has been incorporated into the curricula of surgery syllabus. With the increased use of box trainer simulators, there is a great need for obtaining reliable and objective evaluations of the trainees' performances. Here, we introduce an automated tool for assessing laparoscopic cutting performance by using image-processing algorithms.
Methods: Twenty-seven interns specializing in the fields of gynecology, urology and general surgery participated in 4-6 training sessions, in which each trainee cut a circular patch positioned inside a low-cost laparoscopic box trainer simulator. The trainees' performances were analyzed using software that we developed. The analysis of the trainees' performances was based upon quantitative measurements of the following four parameters obtained in each training session: standard deviation, circle-cutout area, skewness, and number of peaks. We believe that high performance in terms of a combination of the four parameters provides a reliable measure of good laparoscopic skills, and therefore we developed the software so as to generate, for each session, a score of a trainee's laparoscopic circle-cutout performance that results from achievements related to the four parameters in combination.
Results: On average, the total score of experienced interns was higher than the total score of inexperienced interns. Also, some improvement from session-to-session in the scores of novice trainees was detected.
Conclusions: Our proposed scoring system, which is based on various image-processing algorithms, can evaluate cutting performances of trainees and classify residents by their experience. This allows each trainee to improve his/her performance by analyzing errors indicated by our software.
Keywords: Boundary extraction; Image-processing; Laparoscopic box trainer simulator; Signature; Simulation; Surgery education.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux simulator curriculum as an effective teaching tool: Pilot study.J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Feb;12(1):45.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Aug 19. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID: 26350643
-
Validating a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):204.e1-204.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.037. Epub 2016 Apr 27. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27131588 Clinical Trial.
-
Does box model training improve surgical dexterity and economy of movement during virtual reality laparoscopy? A randomised trial.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(1):99-103. doi: 10.1080/00016340701789929. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008. PMID: 18158634 Clinical Trial.
-
Take-Home Training in Laparoscopy.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5335. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385174 Review.
-
The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):343-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1181-0. Epub 2010 Jul 8. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20614142 Review.
Cited by
-
The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082192. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35456285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Validation of a novel, low-fidelity virtual reality simulator and an artificial intelligence assessment approach for peg transfer laparoscopic training.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 19;14(1):16702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67435-6. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39030307 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Novel Education and Simulation Tools in Urologic Training.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Nov 28;20(12):81. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0947-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31782033 Review.
-
A SWOT Analysis of Urology Residency.Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Dec 16;22(12):61. doi: 10.1007/s11934-021-01080-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2021. PMID: 34913100 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources