Radiation dose and image quality with new protocol in lower extremity computed tomography angiography

Abstract

Purpose: To compare radiation dose and image quality of lower extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) between cranio-caudal acquisition with single-source CT (SSCT) and flash caudo-cranial acquisition with dual-source CT (DSCT).

Materials and methods: In this prospective study, 60 patients were randomly assigned to Group A (control) or Group B (experimental) to undergo lower extremity CTA for peripheral obliterative arterial disease. Group A received protocol 1 (P1) with SSCT cranio-caudal acquisition. Group B received protocol (P2) with DSCT flash caudo-cranial acquisition. Intravascular attenuation (IVA), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and image noise were compared. Two radiologists assessed the image quality. Computed tomography volume dose index (CTDI_vol) and dose-length product (DLP) were also compared.

Results: IVA with P2 was higher than with P1 (586.8 ± 140.3 vs. 496.1 ± 129.3 HU, p = 0.011), as was SNR (33.0 ± 11.3 vs. 27.4 ± 12.3; p = 0.042), CNR (30.1 ± 13.3 vs. 24.2 ± 10.3; p = 0.029) and image quality score of small arteries below the knee (3.8 ± 0.2 vs. 3.1 ± 0.2; p = 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly lower in P2 than in P1 with CTDI_vol reduction of 40.9% (1.3 ± 0.1 vs. 2.2 ± 0.3 mGy; p = 0.006) and DLP reduction of 42.8% (148.7 ± 21.9 vs 260.2 ± 59.1 mGy * cm; p = 0.018).

Conclusion: Lower extremity CTA with DSCT flash caudo-cranial acquisition allows lower radiation dose with higher IVA, SNR, CNR and better image quality for small arteries below the knee than SSCT cranio-caudal acquisition.

Keywords: Dual-source computed tomography; Image quality; Lower extremities computed tomography; New protocol; Radiation dose.