Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 19;115(42):697-704.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0697.

The Conservative Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures

Affiliations
Review

The Conservative Treatment of Traumatic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures

Ulrich J Spiegl et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. .

Abstract

Background: The conservative treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures is often not clearly defined.

Methods: This review is based on articles retrieved by a systematic search in the PubMed and Web of Science databases for publications up to February 2018 dealing with the conservative treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. The search initially yielded 3345 hits, of which 35 were suitable for use in this review.

Results: It can be concluded from the available original clinical research on the subject, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), that the primary diagnostic evaluation should be with plain x-rays, in the standing position if possible. If a fracture is suspected on the plain films, computed tomography (CT) is indicated. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is additionally advisable if there is a burst fracture. The spinal deformity resulting from the fracture should be quantified in terms of the Cobb angle. The choice of a conservative or operative treatment strategy is based on the primary stability of the fracture, the degree of deformity, the presence or absence of disc injury, and the patient's clinical state. Our analysis of the three RCTs implies that early functional therapy without a corset should be performed, although treatment in a corset may be appropriate to control pain. Follow-up x-rays should be obtained after mobilization and at one week, three weeks, six weeks, and twelve weeks.

Conclusion: Further comparative studies of the indications for surgery and specific conservative treatment modalities would be desirable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Flow chart of the systematic literature review

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buhren V. Injuries to the thoracic and lumbar spine. Unfallchirurg. 2003;106:55–68. - PubMed
    1. Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R, et al. Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column Part I: epidemiology. Unfallchirurg. 2009;112:33–42. - PubMed
    1. Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, et al. AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine. 2013;38:2028–2037. - PubMed
    1. Verheyden AP, Spiegl UJ, Ekkerlein H, et al. Treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: recommendations of the spine section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU) Global Spine J. 2018;8(2):34–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spiegl UJ, Josten C, Devitt BM, Heyde CE. Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature. Eur Spine J. 2017;12:3187–3198. - PubMed

MeSH terms