Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 19:12:1179069518809057.
doi: 10.1177/1179069518809057. eCollection 2018.

Context-Sensitive Computational Mechanisms of Decision Making

Affiliations
Review

Context-Sensitive Computational Mechanisms of Decision Making

Manisha Chawla et al. J Exp Neurosci. .

Abstract

Real-world information is primarily sensory in nature, and understandably people attach value to the sensory information to prepare for appropriate behavioral responses. This review presents research from value-based, perceptual, and social decision-making domains, so far studied using isolated paradigms and their corresponding computational models. For example, in perceptual decision making, the sensory evidence accumulation rather than value computation becomes central to choice behavior. Furthermore, we identify cross-linkages between the perceptual and value-based domains to help us better understand generic processes pertaining to individual decision making. The purpose of this review is 2-fold. First, we identify the need for integrated study of different domains of decision making. Second, given that both our perception and valuation are influenced by the surrounding context, we suggest the integration of different types of information in decision making could be done by studying contextual influences in decision making. Future research needs to attempt toward a system-level understanding of various subprocesses involved in decision making.

Keywords: Decision making; computational models; neuroeconomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Neural model of decision making. Adapted from Levy and Glimcher.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Schematic diagram of a drift diffusion model.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Context gambles. Adapted from Nieuwenhuis et al.

Similar articles

References

    1. Shadlen MN, Kiani R. Decision making as a window on cognition. Neuron. 2013;80:791–806. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith DV, Huettel SA. Decision neuroscience: neuroeconomics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010;1:854–871. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Montague PR, King-Casas B, Cohen JD. Imaging valuation models in human choice. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:417–448. - PubMed
    1. Dayan P, Balleine BW. Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron. 2002;36:285–298. - PubMed
    1. Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT. Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:363–375. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources