The Addition of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Roller Massage Alone or in Combination Did Not Increase Pain Tolerance or Range of Motion
- PMID: 30479519
- PMCID: PMC6243624
The Addition of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with Roller Massage Alone or in Combination Did Not Increase Pain Tolerance or Range of Motion
Abstract
Roller massage (RM) can be painful and induce muscle activity during application. Acute increases in pain pressure threshold (PPT) and range of motion (ROM) have been previously reported following RM. It is unclear whether the RM-induced increases in PPT and ROM can be attributed to changes in neural or muscle responses. To help determine if neural pain pathways are affected by roller massage, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was utilized as a form of electroanalgesia during RM with PPT and ROM tested on the affected and contralateral quadriceps. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in both quadriceps, the effect of brief intense TENS on PPT and ROM following unilateral RM of the quadriceps. A randomized within subjects' design was used to examine local and non-local effects of TENS and roller massage versus a control condition (rolling without TENS application). Four 30s bouts of roller massage of the dominant quadriceps were implemented with 30s of rest. The researcher applied the RM using a constant pressure device with approximately 70% of the maximum tolerable load. Perceived pain was monitored using a visual analog scale (VAS) during RM. Ipsilateral and contralateral quadriceps ROM and PPT were measured immediately following RM. Significant main effects for time showed increased PPT and ROM in both the treated and contralateral quadriceps, with no significant main effects for intervention or interactions for intervention and time. Moderate to large effect sizes and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) were detected when comparing baseline to pre- and post-tests respectively. VAS scores were significantly (main effect for intervention) and near significantly (interactions) reduced with MCID when TENS was applied during rolling. The addition of TENS to rolling did not increase PPT or ROM in the affected or contralateral quadriceps, likely due to a repeated testing effect.
Keywords: Pain; flexibility; foam roller; self-myofascial release; stretching.
Similar articles
-
Roller massage decreases spinal excitability to the soleus.J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Apr 1;124(4):950-959. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00732.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 4. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018. PMID: 29357488 Clinical Trial.
-
Higher Quadriceps Roller Massage Forces Do Not Amplify Range-of-Motion Increases nor Impair Strength and Jump Performance.J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Nov;32(11):3059-3069. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001906. J Strength Cond Res. 2018. PMID: 30152808 Clinical Trial.
-
Differences in pressure pain threshold among men and women after foam rolling.J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Oct;21(4):978-982. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 15. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017. PMID: 29037655
-
The effect of friction massage on pain intensity, PPT, and ROM in individuals with myofascial trigger points: a systematic review.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 13;26(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08372-x. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40082902 Free PMC article.
-
The Accumulated Effects of Foam Rolling Combined with Stretching on Range of Motion and Physical Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Jul 1;20(3):535-545. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.535. eCollection 2021 Sep. J Sports Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 34267594 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the effects of embedded self-massage practice on strength performance: A randomized crossover pilot trial.PLoS One. 2021 Mar 2;16(3):e0248031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248031. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33651849 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Foam rolling and stretching do not provide superior acute flexibility and stiffness improvements compared to any other warm-up intervention: A systematic review with meta-analysis.J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Jul;13(4):509-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Jan 18. J Sport Health Sci. 2024. PMID: 38244921 Free PMC article.
-
The contralateral effects of foam rolling on range of motion and muscle performance.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 Jun;123(6):1167-1178. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05142-2. Epub 2023 Jan 25. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36694004 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2020 Feb;50(2):387-402. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01205-7. Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31628662
References
-
- Barnes M.F. (1997) The basic science of myofascial release. Morphologic change in connective tissue. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 1, 231-238.
-
- Beardsley C., Skarabot J. (2015) Effects of self-myofascial release: A systematic review. Journal of Bodywork Movement Therapy 19, 747-758. - PubMed
-
- Behara B., Jacobson B.H. (2017) The Acute Effects of Deep Tissue Foam Rolling and Dynamic Stretching on Muscular Strength, Power, and Flexibility in Division I Linemen. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 31(4), 888-892. - PubMed
-
- Behm D.G., Blazevich A.J., Kay A.D., McHugh M. (2015) Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 41, 1-11. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources