Current evidence for spinal X-ray use in the chiropractic profession: a narrative review
- PMID: 30479744
- PMCID: PMC6247638
- DOI: 10.1186/s12998-018-0217-8
Current evidence for spinal X-ray use in the chiropractic profession: a narrative review
Abstract
The use of routine spinal X-rays within chiropractic has a contentious history. Elements of the profession advocate for the need for routine spinal X-rays to improve patient management, whereas other chiropractors advocate using spinal X-rays only when endorsed by current imaging guidelines. This review aims to summarise the current evidence for the use of spinal X-ray in chiropractic practice, with consideration of the related risks and benefits. Current evidence supports the use of spinal X-rays only in the diagnosis of trauma and spondyloarthropathy, and in the assessment of progressive spinal structural deformities such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MRI is indicated to diagnose serious pathology such as cancer or infection, and to assess the need for surgical management in radiculopathy and spinal stenosis. Strong evidence demonstrates risks of imaging such as excessive radiation exposure, overdiagnosis, subsequent low-value investigation and treatment procedures, and increased costs. In most cases the potential benefits from routine imaging, including spinal X-rays, do not outweigh the potential harms. The use of spinal X-rays should not be routinely performed in chiropractic practice, and should be guided by clinical guidelines and clinician judgement.
Keywords: Appropriate use of imaging; Back pain; Chiropractic; Clinical guidelines; Imaging indications; Low back pain; Neck pain; Spinal X-rays.
Conflict of interest statement
Not applicableNot applicableSDF is Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Chiropractic and Manual Therapies. He played no part in the assignment of this manuscript to Associate Editors or peer reviewers, and was blinded in the online editorial system for this manuscript from submission to final decision. Otherwise, the authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
-
- Bolton SP. X-ray dispossessed-expedience versus standards? Chiropractic Journal of Australia. 2004;34(1):23–29.
-
- Pincus T, Kent P, Bronfort G, Loisel P, Pransky G, Hartvigsen J. Twenty-five years with the biopsychosocial model of low back pain—is it time to celebrate? A report from the twelfth international forum for primary care research on low back pain. Spine. 2013;38(24):2118–2123. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8c5d6. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schultz G, Phillips R, Cooley J, Hall T, Hoyt T, Gendreau D, et al. Diagnostic imaging of the spine in chiropractic practice: recommendations for utilization. Chiropractic Journal of Australia. 1992;22(4):141–152.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
