Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 21:26:48.
doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0217-8. eCollection 2018.

Current evidence for spinal X-ray use in the chiropractic profession: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Current evidence for spinal X-ray use in the chiropractic profession: a narrative review

Hazel J Jenkins et al. Chiropr Man Therap. .

Abstract

The use of routine spinal X-rays within chiropractic has a contentious history. Elements of the profession advocate for the need for routine spinal X-rays to improve patient management, whereas other chiropractors advocate using spinal X-rays only when endorsed by current imaging guidelines. This review aims to summarise the current evidence for the use of spinal X-ray in chiropractic practice, with consideration of the related risks and benefits. Current evidence supports the use of spinal X-rays only in the diagnosis of trauma and spondyloarthropathy, and in the assessment of progressive spinal structural deformities such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MRI is indicated to diagnose serious pathology such as cancer or infection, and to assess the need for surgical management in radiculopathy and spinal stenosis. Strong evidence demonstrates risks of imaging such as excessive radiation exposure, overdiagnosis, subsequent low-value investigation and treatment procedures, and increased costs. In most cases the potential benefits from routine imaging, including spinal X-rays, do not outweigh the potential harms. The use of spinal X-rays should not be routinely performed in chiropractic practice, and should be guided by clinical guidelines and clinician judgement.

Keywords: Appropriate use of imaging; Back pain; Chiropractic; Clinical guidelines; Imaging indications; Low back pain; Neck pain; Spinal X-rays.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicableNot applicableSDF is Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Chiropractic and Manual Therapies. He played no part in the assignment of this manuscript to Associate Editors or peer reviewers, and was blinded in the online editorial system for this manuscript from submission to final decision. Otherwise, the authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Bolton SP. X-ray dispossessed-expedience versus standards? Chiropractic Journal of Australia. 2004;34(1):23–29.
    1. Young KJ. Evaluation of publicly available documents to trace chiropractic technique systems that advocate radiography for subluxation analysis: a proposed genealogy. J Chiropr Humanit. 2014;21(1):1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.echu.2014.09.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pincus T, Kent P, Bronfort G, Loisel P, Pransky G, Hartvigsen J. Twenty-five years with the biopsychosocial model of low back pain—is it time to celebrate? A report from the twelfth international forum for primary care research on low back pain. Spine. 2013;38(24):2118–2123. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8c5d6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, et al. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2009;60(10):3072–3080. doi: 10.1002/art.24853. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schultz G, Phillips R, Cooley J, Hall T, Hoyt T, Gendreau D, et al. Diagnostic imaging of the spine in chiropractic practice: recommendations for utilization. Chiropractic Journal of Australia. 1992;22(4):141–152.

Publication types