Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2018 Nov 18;9(11):235-244.
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i11.235.

Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence?

Affiliations
Editorial

Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence?

Greg Aj Robertson et al. World J Orthop. .

Abstract

This editorial reviews and summarises the current evidence (meta-analyses and Cochrane reviews) relating to the use of hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fractures. Regarding the optimal surgical approach, two recent meta-analyses have found that posterior approaches are associated with: higher rates of dislocation compared to lateral and anterior approaches; and higher rates of re-operation compared to lateral approaches. Posterior approaches should therefore be avoided when performing hip hemi-arthroplasty procedures. Assessing the optimal prosthesis head component, three recent meta-analyses and one Cochrane review have found that while unipolar hemi-arthroplasty can be associated with increased rates of acetabular erosion at short-term follow-up (up to 1 year), there is no significant difference between the unipolar hemi-arthroplasty and bipolar hemi-arthroplasty for surgical outcome, complication profile, functional outcome and acetabular erosion rates at longer-term follow-up (2 to 4 years). With bipolar hemi-arthroplasty being the more expensive prosthesis, unipolar hemi-arthroplasty is the recommended option. With regards to the optimal femoral stem insertion technique, three recent meta-analyses and one Cochrane Review have found that, while cemented hip hemi-arthroplasties are associated with a longer operative time compared to uncemented Hip Hemi-arthroplasties, cemented prostheses have lower rates of implant-related complications (particularly peri-prosthetic femoral fracture) and improved post-operative outcome regarding residual thigh pain and mobility. With no significant difference found between the two techniques for medical complications and mortality, cemented hip hemi-arthroplasty would appear to be the superior technique. On the topic of wound closure, one recent meta-analysis has found that, while staples can result in a quicker closure time, there is no significant difference in post-operative infections rates or wound healing outcomes when comparing staples to sutures. Therefore, either suture or staple wound closure techniques appear equally appropriate for hip hemi-arthroplasty procedures.

Keywords: Cement; Femoral; Fracture; Head; Hemi-arthroplasty; Hip; Neck; Prosthesis; Stem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A hip hemi-arthroplasty with a unipolar component head (A); a hip hemi-arthroplasty with a bipolar component head (B); a hip hemi-arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral stem (C); and a hip hemi-arthroplasty with a cemented femoral stem (D).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Royal College of Physicians. National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) annual report 2017. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2017.
    1. National Health Service Scotland. Scottish Hip Fracture Audit: Hip Fracture Care Pathway Report 2017. Edinburgh: NHS National Services Scotland; 2017.
    1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–475. - PubMed
    1. Michael Lewiecki E, Wright NC, Curtis JR, Siris E, Gagel RF, Saag KG, Singer AJ, Steven PM, Adler RA. Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29:717–722. - PubMed
    1. Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S, Lagacé C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Morin S, Hanley DA, Papaioannou A; Osteoporosis Surveillance Expert Working Group. Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA. 2009;302:883–889. - PubMed

Publication types