Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence?
- PMID: 30479970
- PMCID: PMC6242732
- DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i11.235
Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence?
Abstract
This editorial reviews and summarises the current evidence (meta-analyses and Cochrane reviews) relating to the use of hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fractures. Regarding the optimal surgical approach, two recent meta-analyses have found that posterior approaches are associated with: higher rates of dislocation compared to lateral and anterior approaches; and higher rates of re-operation compared to lateral approaches. Posterior approaches should therefore be avoided when performing hip hemi-arthroplasty procedures. Assessing the optimal prosthesis head component, three recent meta-analyses and one Cochrane review have found that while unipolar hemi-arthroplasty can be associated with increased rates of acetabular erosion at short-term follow-up (up to 1 year), there is no significant difference between the unipolar hemi-arthroplasty and bipolar hemi-arthroplasty for surgical outcome, complication profile, functional outcome and acetabular erosion rates at longer-term follow-up (2 to 4 years). With bipolar hemi-arthroplasty being the more expensive prosthesis, unipolar hemi-arthroplasty is the recommended option. With regards to the optimal femoral stem insertion technique, three recent meta-analyses and one Cochrane Review have found that, while cemented hip hemi-arthroplasties are associated with a longer operative time compared to uncemented Hip Hemi-arthroplasties, cemented prostheses have lower rates of implant-related complications (particularly peri-prosthetic femoral fracture) and improved post-operative outcome regarding residual thigh pain and mobility. With no significant difference found between the two techniques for medical complications and mortality, cemented hip hemi-arthroplasty would appear to be the superior technique. On the topic of wound closure, one recent meta-analysis has found that, while staples can result in a quicker closure time, there is no significant difference in post-operative infections rates or wound healing outcomes when comparing staples to sutures. Therefore, either suture or staple wound closure techniques appear equally appropriate for hip hemi-arthroplasty procedures.
Keywords: Cement; Femoral; Fracture; Head; Hemi-arthroplasty; Hip; Neck; Prosthesis; Stem.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Arthroplasty for intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck. Current concept review].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(6):484-92. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012. PMID: 23286679 Review. Czech.
-
Fractures of the femoral neck: a review and personal statement.Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006;73(1):45-59. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006. PMID: 16613748 Review.
-
Lower reoperation rate for cemented femoral stem than for uncemented femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty following a displaced femoral neck fracture.SICOT J. 2015 Oct 16;1:26. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2015028. SICOT J. 2015. PMID: 27163081 Free PMC article.
-
Total hip arthroplasty with minimal invasive surgery in elderly patients with neck of femur fractures: our institutional experience.Injury. 2015 Jan;46 Suppl 1:S13-7. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)70005-7. Epub 2015 Jan 19. Injury. 2015. PMID: 26528934 Clinical Trial.
-
Unipolar versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Is There a Difference?Ann Acad Med Singap. 2015 Jun;44(6):197-201. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2015. PMID: 26292947
Cited by
-
Outcomes of press-fit uncemented versus cemented hip arthroplasty in the oncologic patient.J Orthop. 2020 May 4;22:198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.04.022. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec. J Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32425417 Free PMC article.
-
Never too old for hip arthroplasty: a 111-year-old woman walks out of hospital-a case report and literature review.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(5):253. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.41. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 32309400 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of the Usage of Lidocaine in Hip Replacement Surgery.Cureus. 2023 Apr 12;15(4):e37498. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37498. eCollection 2023 Apr. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37187655 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Anterior and Lateral Approach in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femur Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.Malays Orthop J. 2022 Nov;16(3):113-119. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2211.017. Malays Orthop J. 2022. PMID: 36589369 Free PMC article.
-
Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures in the Elderly: Outcomes and Costings.Indian J Orthop. 2024 Apr 1;58(6):716-721. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01132-4. eCollection 2024 Jun. Indian J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 38812858 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Royal College of Physicians. National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) annual report 2017. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2017.
-
- National Health Service Scotland. Scottish Hip Fracture Audit: Hip Fracture Care Pathway Report 2017. Edinburgh: NHS National Services Scotland; 2017.
-
- Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–475. - PubMed
-
- Michael Lewiecki E, Wright NC, Curtis JR, Siris E, Gagel RF, Saag KG, Singer AJ, Steven PM, Adler RA. Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29:717–722. - PubMed
-
- Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S, Lagacé C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Morin S, Hanley DA, Papaioannou A; Osteoporosis Surveillance Expert Working Group. Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA. 2009;302:883–889. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources