Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 18;1(1):2473974X16685692.
doi: 10.1177/2473974X16685692. eCollection 2017 Jan-Mar.

NSQIP as a Predictor of Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Free Flap Reconstruction

Charles A Riley  1 , Blair M Barton  1 , Claire M Lawlor  1 , David Z Cai  1 , Phoebe E Riley  1 , Edward D McCoul  1   2   3 , Christian P Hasney  1   2   3 , Brian A Moore  1   2   3
Affiliations

NSQIP as a Predictor of Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Free Flap Reconstruction

Charles A Riley et al. OTO Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) calculator was created to improve outcomes and guide cost-effective care in surgery. Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergo ablative and free flap reconstructive surgery with prolonged postoperative courses.

Methods: A case series with chart review was performed on 50 consecutive patients with HNC undergoing ablative and reconstructive free flap surgery from October 2014 to March 2016 at a tertiary care center. Comorbidities and intraoperative and postoperative variables were collected. Predicted length of stay was tabulated with the NSQIP calculator.

Results: Thirty-five patients (70%) were male. The mean (SD) age was 67.2 (13.4) years. The mean (SD) length of stay (LOS) was 13.5 (10.3) days. The mean (SD) NSQIP-predicted LOS was 10.3 (2.2) days (P = .027).

Discussion: The NSQIP calculator may be an inadequate predictor for LOS in patients with HNC undergoing free flap surgery. Additional study is necessary to determine the accuracy of this tool in this patient population.

Implications for practice: Head and neck surgeons performing free flap reconstructive surgery following tumor ablation may find that the NSQIP risk calculator underestimates the LOS in this population.

Keywords: ACS NSQIP; NSQIP; free flap; head and neck; length of stay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arshad H, Ozer HG, Thatcher A, et al. Intensive care unit versus non-intensive care unit postoperative management of head and neck free flaps: comparative effectiveness and cost comparisons. Head Neck. 2014;36:536-539. - PubMed
    1. Haddock NT, Gobble RM, Levine JP. More consistent postoperative care and monitoring can reduce costs following microvascular free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;26:435-439. - PubMed
    1. Weber RS, Lewis CM, Eastman SD, et al. Quality and performance indicators in an academic department of head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:1212-1218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewis CM, Monroe MM, Roberts DB, Hessel AC, Lai SY, Weber RS. An audit and feedback system for effective quality improvement in head and neck surgery: can we become better surgeons? Cancer. 2015;121:1581-1587. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCrory AL, Magnuson JS. Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap in head and neck reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2002;112:2161-2165. - PubMed