Impact of Bacillus spp. spores and gentamicin on the gastrointestinal microbiota of suckling and newly weaned piglets
- PMID: 30481191
- PMCID: PMC6258502
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207382
Impact of Bacillus spp. spores and gentamicin on the gastrointestinal microbiota of suckling and newly weaned piglets
Abstract
Administrating antibiotics to young piglets may have short- and long-term consequences on the gut microbiota. We hypothesised that these consequences may be alleviated by concurrent probiotic administration. The study objective was to investigate the effect of administrating gentamicin and a mixture of Bacillus (B.) licheniformis, B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaeceans spores on the gut microbiota of piglets pre- and post-weaning. Twenty-four sows and their litters were randomly allocated to four treatment groups receiving; a) Bacillus spore mixture (six B. subtilis, two B. amyloliquefaeceans, and one B. licheniformis) fed to sows and piglets (PRO); b) gentamicin (5 mg per day) administered to piglets on day 4, 5, and 6 of age (AB); c) Bacillus spore mixture fed to sows and piglets, and gentamicin to piglets (PRO+AB); or d) no administration of probiotics or antibiotics (CTRL). Faecal and digesta samples were collected repeatedly during the study. Selected samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing, culture counts, and organic acid, biogenic amine and tissue gene expression analysis. Treatment had a significant effect on the faecal microbial community composition on day 28 and 42, and colonic community on day 28. Faecal species richness (observed and estimated) and Shannon index, and colonic species richness, were higher in AB compared to PRO piglets on day 28, and were not significantly different from day 42. PRO piglets had the highest faecal concentration of iso-butyric acid on day 7 and a higher butyric acid concentration compared to CTRL piglets. We conclude that gentamicin and Bacillus spores influence the gut microbial diversity of piglets, although administration of gentamicin did not result in dysbiosis as hypothesised.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Effects of probiotics Pediococcus acidilactici strain MA18/5M and Saccharomyces cerevisiae subsp. boulardii strain SB-CNCM I-1079 on fecal and intestinal microbiota of nursing and weanling piglets.J Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;93(11):5313-26. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9190. J Anim Sci. 2015. PMID: 26641051 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Bacillus subtilis DSM32315 supplementation and dietary crude protein level on performance, gut barrier function and microbiota profile in weaned piglets1.J Anim Sci. 2019 Apr 29;97(5):2125-2138. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz090. J Anim Sci. 2019. PMID: 30883644 Free PMC article.
-
The microbial community of the gut differs between piglets fed sow milk, milk replacer or bovine colostrum.Br J Nutr. 2017 Apr;117(7):964-978. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517000216. Epub 2017 May 2. Br J Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28460652
-
Piglet gut microbial shifts early in life: causes and effects.J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019 Jan 14;10:1. doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0308-3. eCollection 2019. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019. PMID: 30651985 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent Advances in the Physiology of Spore Formation for Bacillus Probiotic Production.Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2019 Sep;11(3):731-747. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9492-x. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2019. PMID: 30515722 Review.
Cited by
-
A Multi-Omics Protocol for Swine Feces to Elucidate Longitudinal Dynamics in Microbiome Structure and Function.Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 28;8(12):1887. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121887. Microorganisms. 2020. PMID: 33260576 Free PMC article.
-
Bacillus spp. as potential probiotics: promoting piglet growth by improving intestinal health.Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 26;11:1429233. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1429233. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 39132437 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bacillus strains as human probiotics: characterization, safety, microbiome, and probiotic carrier.Food Sci Biotechnol. 2019 Oct 8;28(5):1297-1305. doi: 10.1007/s10068-019-00691-9. eCollection 2019 Oct. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2019. PMID: 31695928 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intestinal microbiota modulation and improved growth in pigs with post-weaning antibiotic and ZnO supplementation but only subtle microbiota effects with Bacillus altitudinis.Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 2;11(1):23304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01826-x. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34857778 Free PMC article.
-
Microbiome Analysis Investigating the Impacts of Fermented Spent Mushroom Substrates on the Composition of Microbiota in Weaned Piglets Hindgut.Front Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 11;7:584243. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.584243. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 33263016 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kongsted H. Spædgrisediarré i Danmark Anno 2013. Videnscenter for Svineproduktion; 2013.
-
- Mackie RI, Sghir A, Gaskins HR. Developmental microbial ecology of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(5):1035S–45S. 10.1093/ajcn/69.5.1035s - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sommer F, Baeckhed F. The gut microbiota—masters of host development and physiology. Nature reviews Microbiology. 2013;11(4):227–38. 10.1038/nrmicro2974 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nylund L, Satokari R, Salminen S, de Vos WM. Intestinal microbiota during early life—impact on health and disease. Proc Nutr Soc. 2014;73(4):457–69. 10.1017/S0029665114000627 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous