The impact of failure to achieve symptom control after resection of functional neuroendocrine tumors: An 8-institution study from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group
- PMID: 30481383
- PMCID: PMC10181271
- DOI: 10.1002/jso.25306
The impact of failure to achieve symptom control after resection of functional neuroendocrine tumors: An 8-institution study from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group
Abstract
Background: The goals of resection of functional neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are two-fold: Oncological benefit and symptom control. The interaction between the two is not well understood.
Methods: All patients with functional NETs of the pancreas, duodenum, and ampulla who underwent curative-intent resection between 2000 and 2016 were identified. Using Cox regression analysis, factors associated with reduced recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified.
Results: Two-hundred and thirty patients underwent curative-intent resection. Fifty-three percent were insulinomas, 35% gastrinomas, and 12% were other types. Twenty-one percent had a known genetic syndrome, 23% had lymph node (LN) positivity, 80% underwent an R0 resection, and 14% had no postoperative symptom improvement (SI). Factors associated with reduced RFS included noninsulinoma histology, the presence of a known genetic syndrome, LN positivity, R1 margin, and lack of SI. On multivariable analysis, only the failure to achieve SI following resection was associated with reduced RFS. Considering only those patients with an R0 resection, failure to achieve SI was associated with worse 3-year RFS compared with patients having SI (36% vs 80%; P = 0.006).
Conclusions: Failure to achieve symptomatic improvement after resection of functional NETs is associated with worse RFS. These patients may benefit from short-interval surveillance imaging postoperatively to assess for earlier radiographical disease recurrence.
Keywords: VIPoma; gastrinoma; glucagonoma; insulinoma; recurrence; symptomatic.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No financial or material disclosures to report.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Margin status and long-term prognosis of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor after curative resection: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.Surgery. 2019 Mar;165(3):548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Sep 29. Surgery. 2019. PMID: 30278986 Free PMC article.
-
Early recurrence of well-differentiated (G1) neuroendocrine liver metastasis after curative-intent surgery: Risk factors and outcome.J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;118(7):1096-1104. doi: 10.1002/jso.25246. Epub 2018 Sep 27. J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30261105
-
Association of lymph node metastases, grade and extent of mesenteric lymph node dissection in locoregional small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors with recurrence-free survival.J Neuroendocrinol. 2022 Nov;34(11):e13205. doi: 10.1111/jne.13205. Epub 2022 Nov 17. J Neuroendocrinol. 2022. PMID: 36385444 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factors for relapse in resected gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer Treat Rev. 2021 Dec;101:102299. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102299. Epub 2021 Oct 11. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021. PMID: 34662810
-
Determinants of surgical resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Aug;22(8):610-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.224. Epub 2015 Mar 13. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015. PMID: 25773163 Review.
References
-
- Dickson PV, Behrman SW. Management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surg Clin North Am 2013;93(3):675–691. - PubMed
-
- Parbhu SK, Adler DG. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: contemporary diagnosis and management. Hosp Pract (1995) 2016;44(3):109–119. - PubMed
-
- Anderson CW, Bennett JJ. Clinical presentation and diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2016;25(2):363–374. - PubMed
-
- Cougard P, Goudet P, Peix JL, et al. Insulinomas in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Report of a series of 44 cases by the multiple endocrine neoplasia study group. Ann Chir 2000;125(2):118–123. - PubMed