Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair
- PMID: 30481607
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039
Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair
Abstract
Critical-sized bone defect repair remains a substantial challenge in clinical settings and requires bone grafts or bone substitute materials. However, existing biomaterials often do not meet the clinical requirements of structural support, osteoinductive property, and controllable biodegradability. To treat large-scale bone defects, the development of three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffolds has received considerable focus within bone engineering. A variety of biomaterials and manufacturing methods, including 3D printing, have emerged to fabricate patient-specific bioactive scaffolds that possess controlled micro-architectures for bridging bone defects in complex configurations. During the last decade, with the development of the 3D printing industry, a large number of tissue-engineered scaffolds have been created for preclinical and clinical applications using novel materials and innovative technologies. Thus, this review provides a brief overview of current progress in existing biomaterials and tissue engineering scaffolds prepared by 3D printing technologies, with an emphasis on the material selection, scaffold design optimization, and their preclinical and clinical applications in the repair of critical-sized bone defects. Furthermore, it will elaborate on the current limitations and potential future prospects of 3D printing technology. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: 3D printing has emerged as a critical fabrication process for bone engineering due to its ability to control bulk geometry and internal structure of tissue scaffolds. The advancement of bioprinting methods and compatible ink materials for bone engineering have been a major focus to develop optimal 3D scaffolds for bone defect repair. Achieving a successful balance of cellular function, cellular viability, and mechanical integrity under load-bearing conditions is critical. Hybridization of natural and synthetic polymer-based materials is a promising approach to create novel tissue engineered scaffolds that combines the advantages of both materials and meets various requirements, including biological activity, mechanical strength, easy fabrication and controllable degradation. 3D printing is linked to the future of bone grafts to create on-demand patient-specific scaffolds.
Keywords: 3D printing; Biomaterials; Bone defect; Bone tissue engineering; Porous scaffold.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Application of 3D Printing Technology in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review.Curr Drug Deliv. 2021;18(7):847-861. doi: 10.2174/1567201817999201113100322. Curr Drug Deliv. 2021. PMID: 33191886 Review.
-
Engineering biomaterials to 3D-print scaffolds for bone regeneration: practical and theoretical consideration.Biomater Sci. 2022 May 31;10(11):2789-2816. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00035k. Biomater Sci. 2022. PMID: 35510605 Review.
-
A Novel Bone Substitute with High Bioactivity, Strength, and Porosity for Repairing Large and Load-Bearing Bone Defects.Adv Healthc Mater. 2019 Apr;8(8):e1801298. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801298. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019. PMID: 30773833
-
3D-printed porous tantalum artificial bone scaffolds: fabrication, properties, and applications.Biomed Mater. 2024 May 15;19(4). doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ad46d2. Biomed Mater. 2024. PMID: 38697199 Review.
-
Dual-functional 3D-printed composite scaffold for inhibiting bacterial infection and promoting bone regeneration in infected bone defect models.Acta Biomater. 2018 Oct 1;79:265-275. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Aug 18. Acta Biomater. 2018. PMID: 30125670
Cited by
-
Development of Scaffolds with Chitosan Magnetically Activated with Cobalt Nanoferrite: A Study on Physical-Chemical, Mechanical, Cytotoxic and Antimicrobial Behavior.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Oct 5;17(10):1332. doi: 10.3390/ph17101332. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39458973 Free PMC article.
-
Applying extrusion-based 3D printing technique accelerates fabricating complex biphasic calcium phosphate-based scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration.J Adv Res. 2022 Sep;40:69-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.12.012. Epub 2021 Dec 28. J Adv Res. 2022. PMID: 36100335 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical application and accuracy analysis of 3D printing guide plate based on polylactic acid in mandible reconstruction with fibula flap.Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(6):460. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6781. Ann Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 33850857 Free PMC article.
-
In Vitro Biocompatibility Assessment of Bioengineered PLA-Hydrogel Core-Shell Scaffolds with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Bone Regeneration.J Funct Biomater. 2024 Jul 31;15(8):217. doi: 10.3390/jfb15080217. J Funct Biomater. 2024. PMID: 39194655 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of Titanium Interbody Cages and Current Uses of 3D Printed Titanium in Spine Fusion Surgery.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09912-z. Online ahead of print. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024. PMID: 39003679 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials