Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 31;20(1):34-42.
doi: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.1.34.

High-content analysis of in vitro hepatocyte injury induced by various hepatotoxicants

Affiliations

High-content analysis of in vitro hepatocyte injury induced by various hepatotoxicants

Nga T T Tham et al. J Vet Sci. .

Abstract

In vitro prediction of hepatotoxicity can enhance the performance of non-clinical animal testing for identifying chemical hazards. In this study, we assessed high-content analysis (HCA) using multi-parameter cell-based assays as an in vitro hepatotoxicity testing model using various hepatotoxicants and human hepatocytes such as HepG2 cells and human primary hepatocytes (hPHs). Both hepatocyte types were exposed separately to multiple doses of ten hepatotoxicants associated with liver injury whose mechanisms of action have been described. HCA data were obtained using fluorescence probes for nuclear size (Hoechst), mitochondrial membrane potential (TMRM), cytosolic free calcium (Fluo-4AM), and lipid peroxidation (BODIPY). Cellular alterations were observed in response to all hepatotoxicants tested. The most sensitive parameter was TMRM, with high sensitivity at a low dose, next was BODIPY, followed by Fluo-4AM. HCA data from HepG2 cells and hPHs were generally concordant, although some inconsistencies were noted. Both hepatocyte types showed mild or severe mitochondrial impairment and lipid peroxidation in response to several hepatotoxicants. The results demonstrate that the application of HCA to in vitro hepatotoxicity testing enables more efficient hazard identification, and further, they suggest that certain parameters could serve as sensitive endpoints for predicting the hepatotoxic potential of chemical compounds.

Keywords: HepG2 cell; Hepatotoxicity; High-content analysis; Human primary hepatocyte; Multi-parameter cell-based assay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. High-content analysis of HepG2 cells exposed to various hepatotoxicants. Cells were treated for 24 h with the indicated doses of the following hepatotoxicants: acetaminophen (AAP; 5, 10, and 20 mM), aflatoxin B1 (AFB1; 10, 20, and 50 µM), amiodarone HCl (ADR; 3, 10, and 30 µM), cycloheximide (CHM; 10, 100, and 200 µM), cyclophosphamide monohydrate (CPP; 3, 10, and 30 mM), etoposide (ETP; 10, 20, and 50 µM), lovastatin (LVT; 12.5, 25, and 50 µM), orphenadrine hydrochloride (OPN; 10, 100, and 200 µM), t-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP; 10, 100, and 200 µM), and tetracycline (TC; 10, 100, and 300 µM). The data were obtained using fluorescence probes for nuclear size (Hoechst), mitochondrial membrane potential (TMRM), cytosolic free calcium (Fluo-4AM), and lipid peroxidation (BODIPY). Data are presented as a percentage of the vehicle control (mean ± SE of triplicate wells). *p < 0.05 compared to the vehicle control.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Representative images from high-content analysis of HepG2 cells exposed to different hepatotoxicants. Cells were treated for 24 h with vehicle control (0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) or different hepatotoxicants: acetaminophen (APP) 20 mM, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) 50 µM, amiodarone HCl (ADR) 30 µM, cycloheximide (CHM) 200 µM, cyclophosphamide monohydrate (CPP) 30 mM, etoposide (ETP) 50 µM, lovastatin (LVT) 50 µM, orphenadrine hydrochloride (OPN) 200 µM, t-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP) 200 µM, and tetracycline (TC) 300 µM. Different fluorescence images (20× objective) of each compound tested were obtained from the same field. The number of cells was reduced in all treatments, and TMRM intensity was decreased by most hepatotoxicants.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. High-content analysis of human primary hepatocytes exposed to different hepatotoxicants. Cells were treated for 24 h with various doses of different hepatotoxicants: acetaminophen (AAP; 5, 10, and 20 mM), aflatoxin B1 (AFB1; 10, 20, and 50 µM), amiodarone HCl (ADR; 3, 10, and 30 µM), cycloheximide (CHM; 10, 100, and 200 µM), cyclophosphamide monohydrate (CPP; 3, 10, and 30 mM), etoposide (ETP; 10, 20, and 50 µM), lovastatin (LVT; 12.5, 25, and 50 µM), orphenadrine hydrochloride (OPN; 10, 100, and 200 µM), t-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP; 10, 100, and 200 µM), and tetracycline (TC; 10, 100, and 300 µM). The data were obtained using fluorescence probes for nuclear size (Hoechst), mitochondrial membrane potential (TMRM), cytosolic free calcium (Fluo-4AM), and lipid peroxidation (BODIPY). Data are presented as a percentage of the corresponding vehicle control (mean ± SE of triplicate wells). *p < 0.05 compared to the vehicle control.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Representative images from high-content analysis of human primary hepatocytes exposed to various hepatotoxicants. Cells were treated for 24 h with vehicle control (0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) or the indicated hepatotoxicants: acetaminophen (APP) 20 mM, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) 50 µM, amiodarone HCl (ADR) 30 µM, cycloheximide (CHM) 200 µM, cyclophosphamide monohydrate (CPP) 30 mM, etoposide (ETP) 50 µM, lovastatin (LVT) 50 µM, orphenadrine hydrochloride (OPN) 200 µM, t-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP) 200 µM, or tetracycline (TC) 300 µM. Different fluorescence images (20× objective) of each compound tested were obtained from the same field. Number of cells and TMRM intensity were decreased by most hepatotoxicants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abraham VC, Towne DL, Waring JF, Warrior U, Burns DJ. Application of a high-content multiparameter cytotoxicity assay to prioritize compounds based on toxicity potential in humans. J Biomol Screen. 2008;13:527–537. - PubMed
    1. Begriche K, Massart J, Robin MA, Borgne-Sanchez A, Fromenty B. Drug-induced toxicity on mitochondria and lipid metabolism: mechanistic diversity and deleterious consequences for the liver. J Hepatol. 2011;54:773–794. - PubMed
    1. Davidson MD, Ware BR, Khetani SR. Stem cell-derived liver cells for drug testing and disease modeling. Discov Med. 2015;19:349–358. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Donato MT, Gómez-Lechón MJ, Tolosa L. Using high-content screening technology for studying drug-induced hepatotoxicity in preclinical studies. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2017;12:201–211. - PubMed
    1. Garside H, Marcoe KF, Chesnut-Speelman J, Foster AJ, Muthas D, Kenna JG, Warrior U, Bowes J, Baumgartner J. Evaluation of the use of imaging parameters for the detection of compound-induced hepatotoxicity in 384-well cultures of HepG2 cells and cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes. Toxicol In Vitro. 2014;28:171–181. - PubMed

MeSH terms