Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases
- PMID: 30483462
- PMCID: PMC6237728
- DOI: 10.5395/rde.2018.43.e38
Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases
Abstract
The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with more than one cusp missing and thin remaining walls is challenging for the general practitioner. The use of posts combined with full coverage restorations is a well-established approach, yet not following the minimal invasive principles of adhesive dentistry. Endocrowns are indirect monoblock restorations that use the pulp chamber of the ETT for retention. In this study the fabrication of 4 endocrowns and their clinical performance will be discussed. Two clinical cases include computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing manufactured molar endocrowns (one feldspathic ceramic and one hybrid composite-ceramic restoration) and the other two are dental laboratory manufactured resin composite premolar endocrown restorations. The modified United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical behavior of the restorations at different follow up periods. Endocrown restorations present a satisfactory clinical alternative, either by the use of resin composite or glass ceramic and hybrid materials. Specific guidelines with minimal alterations should be followed for an endocrown restoration to be successful. Due to limited evidence regarding the long term evaluation of this restorative technique, a careful selection of cases should be applied.
Keywords: CAD-CAM; Ceramics; Composite resins; Endocrown; Endodontics.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures



References
-
- Dietschi D, Duc O, Krejci I, Sadan A. Biomechanical considerations for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of the literature, part II (evaluation of fatigue behavior, interfaces, and in vivo studies) Quintessence Int. 2008;39:117–129. - PubMed
-
- Rocca GT, Krejci I. Crown and post-free adhesive restorations for endodontically treated posterior teeth: from direct composite to endocrowns. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8:156–179. - PubMed
-
- Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1995;7:83–94. - PubMed
-
- Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years--preliminary results. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:255–265. - PubMed
-
- Otto T. Computer-aided direct all-ceramic crowns: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24:446–455. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources