Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 13;2(4):158-165.
doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12059. eCollection 2018 Aug.

Systematic review of histological remission criteria in eosinophilic esophagitis

Affiliations
Review

Systematic review of histological remission criteria in eosinophilic esophagitis

Ransome Eke et al. JGH Open. .

Abstract

Elemental diets, dietary elimination, and steroid therapies are the most common therapies in the clinical trials for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Histological findings (usually reported as eosinophils per microscopic high-powered field [hpf]) remain the most common end-point used to define response. Yet, the threshold for defining "response" and "remission" are ill-defined among consensus guidelines and may vary from study to study. We conducted a systematic literature review of articles on eosinophilic esophagitis, published between January 2007 and November 2017, considering histological remission as the primary outcome. We abstracted treatment information and definitions of histological remission or response. A comparison of definitions of histological remission across and within institutions was performed. A total of 61 articles were included in this review, with approximately 60% of the studies published from centers in the United States. Histological definitions of remission of EoE ranged from 0 to ≤20 eosinophils/hpf. The most stringent criteria, ranging from 0 to ≤5 eosinophils/hpf, were commonly used in interventional trial studies that examined the effects of new treatments. We found remarkable variability in definitions between studies, treatment types, and regions. Age or epidemiological distribution of study subjects did not influence the criteria for histological remission. Clinical and histological improvements are important measures of the effects of treatment. Histological findings, the most objective measure of treatment, should provide an optimal method for comparing the effectiveness of various treatments. Yet, our findings suggest a lack of consistent remission criteria in published studies. Considering these inconsistencies, it is difficult to compare the effectiveness of various treatments.

Keywords: eosinophilic esophagitis; histological; improvement; remission; response; treatment; trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of article selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Definitions of histological remission of EoE by study types.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparing variation in the definition of histological remission of EoE between studies from the United States versus European regions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liacouras CA, Spergel J, Gober LM. Eosinophilic esophagitis: Clinical presentation in children. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 2014; 43: 219–29. - PubMed
    1. Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I et al Eosinophilic esophagitis: Updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011; 128: 3–20. - PubMed
    1. Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH et al Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology. 2007; 133: 1342–63. - PubMed
    1. Mukkada VA, Furuta GT. Management of refractory eosinophilic esophagitis. Dig. Dis. 2014; 32: 134–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aceves SS. Unmet therapeutic needs in eosinophilic esophagitis. Dig. Dis. 2014; 32: 143–8. - PMC - PubMed