Social Withdrawal in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: Measurement Issues, Normative Development, and Distinct Trajectories
- PMID: 30483901
- PMCID: PMC6469640
- DOI: 10.1007/s10802-018-0497-4
Social Withdrawal in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: Measurement Issues, Normative Development, and Distinct Trajectories
Abstract
Social withdrawal during adolescence and early adulthood is particularly problematic due to the increasing importance of social interactions during these ages. Yet little is known about the changes, trajectories, or correlates of being withdrawn during this transition to adulthood. The purpose of this study was to examine the normative change and distinct trajectories of withdrawal in order to identify adolescents and early adults at greatest risk for maladjustment. Participants were from a Dutch population-based cohort study (Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey), including 1917 adolescents who were assessed at four waves from the age of 16 to 25 years. Five items from the Youth Self Report and Adult Self Report were found to be measurement invariant and used to assess longitudinal changes in social withdrawal. Overall, participants followed a U-shaped trajectory of social withdrawal, where withdrawal decreased from ages 16 to 19 years, remained stable from 19 to 22 years, and increased from 22 to 25 years. Furthermore, three distinct trajectory classes of withdrawal emerged: a low-stable group (71.8%), a high-decreasing group (12.0%), and a low-curvilinear group (16.2%). The three classes differed on: shyness, social affiliation, reduced social contact, anxiety, and antisocial behaviors. The high-decreasing group endorsed the highest social maladjustment, followed by the low-curvilinear group, and the low-stable group was highly adjusted. We discuss the potential contribution of the changing social network in influencing withdrawal levels, the distinct characteristics of each trajectory group, and future directions in the study of social withdrawal in adolescence and early adulthood.
Keywords: Adolescence; Early adulthood; Measurement invariance; Social withdrawal; Trajectories.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures were approved by the Dutch Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, therefore complying with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed Consent
The participants of the study provided written consent at the second through sixth assessment waves. A parent provided written parental consent for adolescent participation during the first three assessment waves, and written consent to participate at every assessment wave.
Figures


References
-
- Achenbach TM. Manual for the ASEBA School-age Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont; 2001.
-
- Achenbach TM. Rescorla LA. Manual for ASEBA adult forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont; 2003.
-
- Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA Adult Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2003.
-
- Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Multicultural supplement to the manual for the ASEBA School-age Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2007.
-
- Asendorpf JB. Beyond social withdrawal: Shyness, unsociability, and peer avoidance. Human Development. 1990;33:250–259.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources