Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project
- PMID: 30483961
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5835-2
Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project
Abstract
Introduction and purpose: Little information exists on surgical characteristics, complications and outcomes with corrective surgery for rigid cervical kyphosis (CK). To collate the experience of international experts, the CSRS-Europe initiated an international multi-centre retrospective study.
Methods: Included were patients at all ages with rigid CK. Surgical and patient specific characteristics, complications and outcomes were studied. Radiographic assessment included global and regional sagittal parameters. Cervical sagittal balance was stratified according to the CSRS-Europe classification of sagittal cervical balance (types A-D).
Results: Eighty-eight patients with average age of 58 years were included. CK etiology was ankylosing spondlitis (n = 34), iatrogenic (n = 25), degenerative (n = 9), syndromatic (n = 6), neuromuscular (n = 4), traumatic (n = 5), and RA (n = 5). Blood loss averaged 957 ml and the osteotomy grade 4.CK-correction and blood loss increased with osteotomy grade (r = 0.4/0.6, p < .01). Patients with different preop sagittal balance types had different approaches, preop deformity parameters and postop alignment changes (e.g. C7-slope, C2-7 SVA, translation). Correction of the regional kyphosis angle (RKA) was average 34° (p < .01). CK-correction was increased in patients with osteoporosis and osteoporotic vertebrae (POV, p = .006). 22% of patients experienced a major long-term complication and 14% needed revision surgery. Patients with complications had larger preop RKA (p = .01), RKA-change (p = .005), and postop increase in distal junctional kyphosis angle (p = .02). The POV-Group more often experienced postop complications (p < .0001) and revision surgery (p = .02). Patients with revision surgery had a larger RKA-change (p = .003) and postop translation (p = .04). 21% of patients had a postop segmental motor deficit and the risk was elevated in the POV-Group (p = .001).
Conclusions: Preop patient specific, radiographic and surgical variables had a significant bearing on alignment changes, outcomes and complication occurrence in the treatment of rigid CK.
Keywords: Cervical osteotomy; Cervical spine; Kyphosis; Rigid deformity.
Similar articles
-
Predictive model for distal junctional kyphosis after cervical deformity surgery.Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2187-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 27. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29709551
-
Magnitude of preoperative cervical lordotic compensation and C2-T3 angle are correlated to increased risk of postoperative sagittal spinal pelvic malalignment in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 8. Spine J. 2015. PMID: 25862507
-
Cervical sagittal alignment in adult hyperkyphosis treated by posterior instrumentation and in situ bending.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Feb;103(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 23. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 27889355
-
[Fixed cervical high-grade kyphosis : Chin-on-chest deformity-Treatment plan].Orthopade. 2018 Jun;47(6):505-517. doi: 10.1007/s00132-018-3564-1. Orthopade. 2018. PMID: 29666897 Review. German.
-
Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S149-60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 24113358 Review.
Cited by
-
A new nomenclature system for the surgical treatment of cervical spine deformity, developing, and validation of SOF system.Eur Spine J. 2021 Jun;30(6):1670-1680. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06751-1. Epub 2021 Feb 6. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33547943
-
Neurological Complications and Recovery Rates of Patients With Adult Cervical Deformity Surgeries.Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1091-1097. doi: 10.1177/2192568220975735. Epub 2020 Nov 23. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 33222533 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Strategy for the Management of Cervical Deformity Is Based on Type of Cervical Deformity.J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 21;10(21):4826. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214826. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34768346 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical Deformity: Evaluation, Classification, and Surgical Planning.Neurospine. 2020 Dec;17(4):833-842. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040524.262. Epub 2020 Dec 31. Neurospine. 2020. PMID: 33401860 Free PMC article.
-
Atlantoaxial Instability in the Course of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Relation to Selected Parameters of Sagittal Balance.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 29;13(15):4441. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154441. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124707 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous