Membrane fouling and performance of anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor treating phenol- and quinoline-containing wastewater: granular activated carbon vs polyaluminum chloride
- PMID: 30484054
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3802-4
Membrane fouling and performance of anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor treating phenol- and quinoline-containing wastewater: granular activated carbon vs polyaluminum chloride
Abstract
Although anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) has been proposed for the treatment of phenolic wastewater, the membrane fouling is still a major obstacle. The effects of dosing of granular activated carbon (GAC) and polyaluminum chloride (PACl) on the treatment performance and membrane fouling of anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor were investigated for treating phenol- and quinoline-containing wastewater. The results suggested that the one-off dosing of GAC resulted in a decrease of protein/carbohydrate ratio, which might account for the aggravation of membrane fouling alongside with the decreased flocs size. Nevertheless, the substrate uptake rates (SUR) of phenol and quinoline, and the specific methanogenic activity of sludge at the GAC dosing stage of experimental reactor (R1) were 8.79 ± 0.63 mg phenol g-1 MLVSS d-1, 7.01 ± 0.09 mg quinoline g-1 MLVSS d-1 and 0.27 ± 0.01 g CODCH4 g-1 MLVSS d-1, which were 1.69, 3.59 and 1.93 times higher than that of the control reactor (R2). The dosing of PACl reduced the membrane fouling rate by changing the floc structure of sludge, as well as the component of SMP and EPS. However, the substrate uptake rate of quinoline was declined. This work provides a comprehensive evaluation on the effect of GAC and PACl dosing on membrane fouling and performance of anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor treating phenol-and quinoline-containing wastewater.
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Anaerobic membrane bioreactor; Granular activated carbon; Membrane fouling; Phenol; Polyaluminum chloride.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Sludge Retention Time on the Performance of Anaerobic Ceramic Membrane Bioreactor Treating High-Strength Phenol Wastewater.Archaea. 2020 Aug 1;2020:8895321. doi: 10.1155/2020/8895321. eCollection 2020. Archaea. 2020. PMID: 32831644 Free PMC article.
-
Anaerobic membrane bioreactor coupled with polyaluminum chloride for high-strength phenolic wastewater treatment: Robust performance and potential mechanisms.Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 1):118777. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118777. Epub 2024 Mar 23. Environ Res. 2024. PMID: 38527723
-
Rapid establishment of phenol- and quinoline-degrading consortia driven by the scoured cake layer in an anaerobic baffled ceramic membrane bioreactor.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Nov;24(33):26125-26135. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0284-8. Epub 2017 Sep 24. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017. PMID: 28944420
-
In-situ membrane fouling control and performance improvement by adding materials in anaerobic membrane bioreactor: A review.Sci Total Environ. 2023 Mar 20;865:161262. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161262. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID: 36586290 Review.
-
Insight into key interactions between diverse factors and membrane fouling mitigation in anaerobic membrane bioreactor.Environ Pollut. 2024 Apr 15;347:123750. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123750. Epub 2024 Mar 9. Environ Pollut. 2024. PMID: 38467364 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Sludge Retention Time on the Performance of Anaerobic Ceramic Membrane Bioreactor Treating High-Strength Phenol Wastewater.Archaea. 2020 Aug 1;2020:8895321. doi: 10.1155/2020/8895321. eCollection 2020. Archaea. 2020. PMID: 32831644 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Solid Retention Time on Membrane Fouling and Biogas Recovery in Anerobic Membrane Bioreactor Treating Sugarcane Industry Wastewater in Sahelian Climate.Membranes (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;13(8):710. doi: 10.3390/membranes13080710. Membranes (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37623771 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources