Spectrum of urologic complications in obstetrics and gynecology: 13 years' experience from a tertiary referral center
- PMID: 30484765
- PMCID: PMC6469735
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.92072
Spectrum of urologic complications in obstetrics and gynecology: 13 years' experience from a tertiary referral center
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the patterns of presentation and management for urologic complications of obstetrics and gynecology in the form of genitourinary fistulas at a tertiary referral center and highlight the social issues associated with them.
Material and methods: We conducted this retrospective study analyzing 311 patients with genitourinary fistulas after obstetric and gynecologic surgeries between January 2005 and January 2018. We recorded the patients' characteristics and area of residence and then analyzed the etiology, surgical management and success rates by grouping the patients into four types of genitourinary fistulas. The primary end point of success was patient being leak free.
Results: Majority of patients (90.4%) were from rural areas. The distribution of genitourinary fistulas in descending order was vesicovaginal (79.7%), ureterovaginal (11.8%), urethrovaginal (10.2%) and vesicouterine fistulas (2.6%). The mean time to presentation was 25.80±48.69 days with a wide range of 10 days to 360 months. The most common etiology was obstructed labour (58.5%) followed by abdominal hysterectomy (32.7%). For vesicovaginal fistulas the route to be used for repair depended on surgeon's preference and both transabdominal and transvaginal routes had almost equal success rates. The success rate of laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair was 89.4% and all (100%) laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomies were successful.
Conclusion: Genitourinary fistulas especially due to obstructed labour are still common in developing world showcasing the problem of inequitable distribution of healthcare. The surgical treatment approach depends on the surgeon's familiarity with the said procedure although versatility is required.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Genitourinary fistulas of obstetric origin.Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;34(4):489-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1025679205541. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002. PMID: 14577490
-
Genitourinary Fistula: epidemiology, changing trends in etiology and management: A tertiary care institute's perspective.Urologia. 2024 May;91(2):243-248. doi: 10.1177/03915603241238597. Epub 2024 Mar 18. Urologia. 2024. PMID: 38497528
-
Our experience with genitourinary fistulae.Urol Int. 2009;82(4):404-10. doi: 10.1159/000218528. Epub 2009 Jun 8. Urol Int. 2009. PMID: 19506406
-
[Diagnostic and therapeutic concepts for vesicovaginal and ureterovaginal fistulas].Aktuelle Urol. 2018 Feb;49(1):83-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-125318. Epub 2018 Feb 1. Aktuelle Urol. 2018. PMID: 29390221 Review. German.
-
Laparoscopic treatment of genitourinary fistulae.Arch Esp Urol. 2012 Sep;65(7):659-72. Arch Esp Urol. 2012. PMID: 22971761 Review. English, Spanish.
Cited by
-
Urethrovaginal fistula repair with or without concurrent fascial sling placement: A retrospective review.Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 May;15(5):E276-E280. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6786. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021. PMID: 33119501 Free PMC article.
-
Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistulae: A Systematic Review.Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb 1;143(2):229-241. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005468. Epub 2023 Nov 30. Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38033311 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jones HW, Rock JA. Te Linde’s operative gynecology. LippincottWilliams & Wilkins; 2015.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources