Readability and understandability of andrology questionnaires
- PMID: 30484766
- PMCID: PMC6469730
- DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.75272
Readability and understandability of andrology questionnaires
Abstract
Objective: Medical questionnaires, which enable collection, comparison and analysis of appropriate data as a means of written communication between a patient and a doctor, must be easily readable, and understandable. Here, we measure the readability and understandability of questionnaires used in andrology and examine the relationship between the educational status of the patients and the understandability of the forms.
Material and methods: Seven questionnaires (SHIM, AIPE, IIEF, MSHQ-EjD, PEDT, NIH-CPSI and IPSS) used to diagnose andological diseases were selected from the European Association of Urology guidelines. The number of syllables per word, the number of words in a sentence, and the average word and sentence lengths were calculated for each Turkish validated form. Readability scores were calculated, and closet tests were used to measure the understandability of the texts.
Results: Three hundred and twenty-seven male volunteers participated in the study. Two hundred and sixteen of the participants (66%) had a high school or college education. The readability level of the seven forms was determined to be "Difficult" or "Very Difficult," and at least a high school education level was required to understand the forms. As education level and monthly income increased, the understandability of the forms increased; as the readability of the forms became more difficult, their understandability decreased (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The readability levels of questionnaires used in andrology are well above the reading level of Turkey. Health providers can help patients to fill out forms to increase doctor-patient communication.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Are Online Zenker's Diverticulum Materials Readable and Understandable?Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Nov;155(5):758-763. doi: 10.1177/0194599816655302. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016. PMID: 27329416
-
Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):460-4. doi: 10.1177/0194599815626146. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016. PMID: 26861227
-
Is There a Difference Between the Readabilities of Informed Consent Forms Used for Elective and Emergency Procedures in Turkey?Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 May;54(3):626-630. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00096-0. Epub 2020 Jan 6. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020. PMID: 33301132
-
How readable are Australian multilingual diabetes patient education materials? An evaluation of national English-language source texts.Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Mar 10;30(1):3012002. doi: 10.17061/phrp3012002. Public Health Res Pract. 2020. PMID: 32152614
-
Readability of Trauma-Related Patient Education Materials From the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.Trauma Mon. 2016 Feb 6;21(1):e20141. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.20141. eCollection 2016 Feb. Trauma Mon. 2016. PMID: 27218045 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Omit needless words: Sentence length perception.PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282146. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36827285 Free PMC article.
References
-
- DuBay WH. The Principles of Readibility. Costa. Mesa, CA: 2004.
-
- Institute of Medicine. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004. - PubMed
-
- The Nation’s Health. Millions of Americans Suffer From Low Health Literacy. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2004.
-
- OECD Skills Studies. Skills Matter, Further Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. Published on June 28, 2016.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials