Trends in use of prescription stimulants in the United States and Territories, 2006 to 2016
- PMID: 30485268
- PMCID: PMC6261411
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206100
Trends in use of prescription stimulants in the United States and Territories, 2006 to 2016
Abstract
Background: Stimulants are considered the first-line treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in the US and they are used in other indications. Stimulants are also diverted for non-medical purposes. Ethnic and regional differences in ADHD diagnosis and in stimulant use have been identified in earlier research. The objectives of this report were to examine the pharmacoepidemiological pattern of these controlled substances over the past decade and to conduct a regional analysis.
Methods: Data (drug weights) reported to the US Drug Enforcement Administration's Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System for four stimulants (amphetamine, methylphenidate, lisdexamfetamine, and methamphetamine) were obtained from 2006 to 2016 for Unites States/Territories. Correlations between state level use (mg/person) and Hispanic population were completed.
Results: Amphetamine use increased 2.5 fold from 2006 to 2016 (7.9 to 20.0 tons). Methylphenidate use, at 16.5 tons in 2006, peaked in 2012 (19.4 tons) and subsequently showed a modest decline (18.6 tons in 2016). The consumption per municipality significantly increased 7.6% for amphetamine and 5.5% for lisdexamfetamine but decreased 2.7% for methylphenidate (all p < .0005) from 2015 to 2016. Pronounced regional differences were also observed. Lisdexamfetamine use in 2016 was over thirty-fold higher in the Southern US (43.8 mg/person) versus the Territories (1.4 mg/person). Amphetamine use was about one-third lower in the West (48.1 mg/person) relative to the Northeastern (75.4 mg/person, p < .05) or the Midwestern (69.9 mg/person, p ≤ .005) states. States with larger Hispanic populations had significantly lower methylphenidate (r(49) = -0.63), lisdexamfetamine (B, r(49) = -0.49), and amphetamine (r(49) = -0.43) use.
Conclusions: Total stimulant usage doubled in the last decade. There were dynamic changes but also regional disparities in the use of stimulant medications. Future research is needed to better understand the reasons for the sizable regional and ethnic variations in use of these controlled substances.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Increasing prevalence of parent-reported attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among children—United States, 2003 and 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010. 59(44):1439–1443. - PubMed
-
- Jensen PS, Kettle L, Roper MT, Sloan MT, Dulcan MK, Hoven C, et al. Are stimulants overprescribed? Treatment of ADHD in four U.S. communities. J Am Acad Child Adoles Psychiatry. 1999; 38:797–804. - PubMed
-
- Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distribution of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidy Survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:593–602. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kessler RC, Adler L, Barkley R, Biederman J, Conners CK, Faraone SV, et al. The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:716–723. 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.4.716 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous