Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207052.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207052. eCollection 2018.

Mark-release-recapture meets Species Distribution Models: Identifying micro-habitats of grassland butterflies in agricultural landscapes

Affiliations

Mark-release-recapture meets Species Distribution Models: Identifying micro-habitats of grassland butterflies in agricultural landscapes

Jan C Habel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Habitat demands and species mobility strongly determine the occurrence of species. Sedentary species with specific habitat requirements are assumed to occur more patchy than mobile habitat generalist species, and thus suffer stronger under habitat fragmentation and habitat deterioration. In this study we measured dispersal and habitat preference of three selected butterfly species using mark-release-recapture technique. We used data on species abundance to calculate Species Distribution Models based on high-resolution aerial photographs taken using RGB / NIR cameras mounted on a UAV. We found that microhabitats for species with specific habitat requirements occur spatially restricted. In contrast, suitable habitats are more interconnected and widespread for mobile habitat generalists. Our models indicate that even managed grassland sites have comparatively little habitat quality, while road verges provide high quality micro-habitats. In addition, dispersal was more restricted for specialist butterfly species, and higher for the two other butterfly species with less ecological specialisation. This study shows synergies arising when combining ecological data with high precision aerial pictures and Species Distribution Models, to identify micro-habitats for butterflies. This approach might be suitable to identify and conserve high quality habitats, and to improve nature conservation at the ground.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study area and potential distribution of Melanargia galathea, Erebia medusa and Coenonympha arcania.
Warmer colours suggest higher environmental suitability. Circles indicate sampling locations where mark-release-recapture was conducted. Black areas were not covered by UAV flights.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dennis RLH, Eales HT (1997) Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Muller, 1764) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae): habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolation. J Insect Conserv 1: 167–176.
    1. Habel JC, Rödder D, Lens L, Schmitt T (2013) The genetic signature of ecologically different grassland Lepidopterans. Biodiv Conserv 22: 2401–2411.
    1. Batáry P, Gallé R, Riesch F, Fischer C, Dormann CF, Mußhoff O et al. (2017) The former Iron Curtain still drives biodiversity–profit trade-offs in German agriculture. Nature Ecol Evol 1: 1279–1284. - PubMed
    1. Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Mountford JO, Gowing DJ (2004) Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303: 1876–1879. 10.1126/science.1094678 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser WW, Emmerson M, Morales MB et al. (2010) Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Appl Ecol 11: 97–105.