Exploring attentional bias towards threatening faces in chimpanzees using the dot probe task
- PMID: 30485317
- PMCID: PMC6261591
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207378
Exploring attentional bias towards threatening faces in chimpanzees using the dot probe task
Abstract
Primates have evolved to rapidly detect and respond to danger in their environment. However, the mechanisms involved in attending to threatening stimuli are not fully understood. The dot-probe task is one of the most widely used experimental paradigms to investigate these mechanisms in humans. However, to date, few studies have been conducted in non-human primates. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the dot-probe task can measure attentional biases towards threatening faces in chimpanzees. Eight adult chimpanzees participated in a series of touch screen dot-probe tasks. We predicted faster response times towards chimpanzee threatening faces relative to neutral faces and faster response times towards faces of high threat intensity (scream) than low threat intensity (bared teeth). Contrary to prediction, response times for chimpanzee threatening faces relative to neutral faces did not differ. In addition, we found no difference in response times for faces of high and low threat intensity. In conclusion, we found no evidence that the touch screen dot-probe task can measure attentional biases specifically towards threatening faces in our chimpanzees. Methodological limitations of using the task to measure emotional attention in human and non-human primates, including stimulus threat intensity, emotional state, stimulus presentation duration and manual responding are discussed.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Search asymmetries for threatening faces in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).J Comp Psychol. 2022 Feb;136(1):20-34. doi: 10.1037/com0000302. Epub 2021 Nov 29. J Comp Psychol. 2022. PMID: 34843313
-
Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207695. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30481190 Free PMC article.
-
It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2463-2481. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02017-y. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020. PMID: 32236834 Free PMC article.
-
Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review.Psychophysiology. 2018 Jun;55(6):e13051. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13051. Epub 2017 Dec 20. Psychophysiology. 2018. PMID: 29266532
-
The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1686-1717. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017. PMID: 28092078 Review.
Cited by
-
Familiarity mediates apes' attentional biases toward human faces.Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Apr 27;289(1973):20212599. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2599. Epub 2022 Apr 27. Proc Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35473378 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring affect-related cognitive bias: Do mice in opposite affective states react differently to negative and positive stimuli?PLoS One. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):e0226438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226438. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31887167 Free PMC article.
-
Introduction to Special Issue on Affective Science in Animals: Toward a Greater Understanding of Affective Processes in Non-Human Animals.Affect Sci. 2022 Dec 3;3(4):697-702. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00168-9. eCollection 2022 Dec. Affect Sci. 2022. PMID: 36514490 Free PMC article.
-
Recognising depression in non-human primates: a narrative review of reported signs of depression.PeerJ. 2025 Jan 7;13:e18766. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18766. eCollection 2025. PeerJ. 2025. PMID: 39802190 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selective and prolonged attention to emotional scenes in humans and bonobos.Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Aug;291(2028):20240433. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0433. Epub 2024 Aug 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39106955 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adachi I, Tomonaga M. Face perception and processing in nonhuman primates In: Call J, Burghardt GM, Pepperberg IM, Snowdon CT, Zentall T, editors. APA Handbook of Comparative Psychology: Perception, Learning, and Cognition. Washington; American Psychological Association; 2017. pp. 141–161.
-
- Ekman P. Cross-cultural studies of facial expressions In: Ekman P, editor. Darwin and facial expressions: A Century of Research in Review. New York: Academic Press; 1973. pp. 169–222.
-
- Ekman P, Friesen WV. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1971. February; 17(2): 124–129. - PubMed
-
- Chevalier-Skolnikoff S. Facial expression of emotion in nonhuman primates In: Ekman P, editor. Darwin and facial expressions: A Century of Research in Review. New York: Academic Press; 1973. pp. 11–89.
-
- Darwin C. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. 1st ed. London UK: John Murray; 1872.