Cesarean delivery rate and staffing levels of the maternity unit
- PMID: 30485335
- PMCID: PMC6261590
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207379
Cesarean delivery rate and staffing levels of the maternity unit
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether staffing levels of maternity units affect prelabor urgent, elective, and intrapartum cesarean delivery rates.
Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study covers the deliveries of the 11 hospitals of a French perinatal network in 2008-2014 (N = 102 236). The independent variables were women's demographic and medical characteristics as well as the type, organization, and staffing levels for obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and midwives of each maternity unit. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted with multilevel logistic models.
Results: Overall, 23.9% of the women had cesarean deliveries (2.4% urgent before labor, 10% elective, and 11.5% intrapartum). Independently of individual- and hospital-level factors, the level of obstetricians, measured by the number of full-time equivalent persons (i.e., 35 working hours per week) per 100 deliveries, was negatively associated with intrapartum cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 0.55, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.36-0.83, P-value = 0.005), and the level of midwives negatively associated with elective cesarean delivery (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, P-value < 0.001). Accordingly, a 10% increase in obstetrician and midwife staff levels, respectively, would have been associated with a decrease in the likelihood of intrapartum cesarean delivery by 2.5 percentage points and that of elective cesarean delivery by 3.4 percentage points. These changes represent decreases in intrapartum and elective cesarean delivery rates of 19% (from 13.1% to 10.6%) and 33% (from 10.3% to 6.9%), respectively.
Conclusion: Staffing levels of maternity units affect the use of cesarean deliveries. High staffing levels for obstetricians and midwives are associated with lower cesarean rates.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Status of the midwifery workforce and childbirth services and the impact of midwife staffing on birth outcomes in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2024 May 1;14(5):e082527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082527. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38692722 Free PMC article.
-
Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study.Birth. 2018 Jun;45(2):159-168. doi: 10.1111/birt.12334. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Birth. 2018. PMID: 29388247 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):75.e1-75.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Aug 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27589899 Free PMC article.
-
Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):60-6. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12137. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 24588878
-
[Impact of organizational factors on the cesarean delivery occurrence in a low-risk population].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Nov;46(10-11):706-712. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30318361 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Status of the midwifery workforce and childbirth services and the impact of midwife staffing on birth outcomes in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2024 May 1;14(5):e082527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082527. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38692722 Free PMC article.
-
Investing in midwifery for sustainable development goals in low- and middle-income countries: a cost-benefit analysis.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 Jan 4;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00507-y. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024. PMID: 38178078 Free PMC article.
-
Capacity Planning (Capital, Staff and Costs) of Inpatient Maternity Services: Pitfalls for the Unwary.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jan 10;22(1):87. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010087. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39857540 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling the Number of People per Physician, Nurse, and Midwives in Turkey in Terms of Reproductive Health Indicators.Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211020873. doi: 10.1177/00469580211020873. Inquiry. 2021. PMID: 34078168 Free PMC article.
-
Accurate prediction of birth implementing a statistical model through the determination of steroid hormones in saliva.Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 10;11(1):5617. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84924-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33692437 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth 2011;38(2):99–104. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One 2016;11(2):e0148343 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief 2010;(35):1–8. - PubMed
-
- Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206(4):331.e1–19. - PubMed
-
- Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer A, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21(2):98–113. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical