Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 28;7(12):492.
doi: 10.3390/jcm7120492.

Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis-A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Ligature-Induced Experimental Peri-Implantitis-A Systematic Review

David Reinedahl et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

This systematic review sought to analyze different experimental peri-implantitis models, their potential to induce marginal bone resorption (MBR) and the necessity of bacteria for bone loss to occur in these models. An electronic search in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was undertaken. A total of 133 studies were analyzed. Most studies induced peri-implantitis with ligatures that had formed a biofilm, sometimes in combination with inoculation of specific bacteria but never in a sterile environment. Most vertical MBR resulted from new ligatures periodically packed above old ones, followed by periodically exchanged ligatures and ligatures that were not exchanged. Cotton ligatures produced the most MBR, followed by steel, "dental floss" (not further specified in the studies) and silk. The amount of MBR varied significantly between different animal types and implant surfaces. None of the analyzed ligature studies aimed to validate that bacteria are necessary for the inducement of MBR. It cannot be excluded that bone loss can be achieved by other factors of the model, such as an immunological reaction to the ligature itself or trauma from repeated ligature insertions. Because all the included trials allowed plaque accumulation on the ligatures, bone resorbing capacity due to other factors could not be excluded or evaluated here.

Keywords: aseptic loosening; dental implant; ligature-induced peri-implantitis; osseointegration; peri-implantitis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection.

References

    1. Hickey J.S., O'Neal R.B., Scheidt M.J., Strong S.L., Turgeon D., Van Dyke T.E. Microbiologic characterization of ligature-induced peri-implantitis in the microswine model. J. Periodontol. 1991;62:548–553. doi: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.9.548. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindhe J., Berglundh T., Ericsson I., Liljenberg B., Marinello C. Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. A study in the beagle dog. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:9–16. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030102.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindhe J., Meyle J., D.o.E.W.o.P. Group Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2008;35:282–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01283.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albrektsson T., Dahlin C., Jemt T., Sennerby L., Turri A., Wennerberg A. Is marginal bone loss around oral implants the result of a provoked foreign body reaction? Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2014;16:155–165. doi: 10.1111/cid.12142. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carcuac O., Abrahamsson I., Albouy J.P., Linder E., Larsson L., Berglundh T. Experimental periodontitis and peri-implantitis in dogs. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:363–371. doi: 10.1111/clr.12067. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources