Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):184.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0868-5.

Advance care planning conversations with palliative patients: looking through the GP's eyes

Affiliations

Advance care planning conversations with palliative patients: looking through the GP's eyes

Anne B Wichmann et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Although it is often recommended that general practitioners (GPs) initiate advance care planning (ACP), little is known about their experiences with ACP. This study aimed to identify GP experiences when conducting ACP conversations with palliative patients, and what factors influence these experiences.

Methods: Dutch GPs (N = 17) who had participated in a training on timely ACP were interviewed. Data from these interviews were analysed using direct content analysis.

Results: Four themes were identified: ACP and society, the GP's perceived role in ACP, initiating ACP and tailor-made ACP. ACP was regarded as a 'hot topic'. At the same time, a tendency towards a society in which death is not a natural part of life was recognized, making it difficult to start ACP discussions. Interviewees perceived having ACP discussions as a typical GP task. They found initiating and timing ACP easier with proactive patients, e.g. who are anxious of losing capacity, and much more challenging when it concerned patients with COPD or heart failure. Patients still being treated in hospital posed another difficulty, because they often times are not open to discussion. Furthermore, interviewees emphasized that taking into account changing wishes and the fact that not everything can be anticipated, is of the utmost importance. Moreover, when patients are not open to ACP, at a certain point it should be granted that choosing not to know, for example about where things are going or what possible ways of care planning might be, is also a form of autonomy.

Conclusions: ACP currently is a hot topic, which has favourable as well as unfavourable effects. As GPs experience difficulties in initiating ACP if patients are being treated in the hospital, future research could focus on a multidisciplinary ACP approach and the role of medical specialists in ACP. Furthermore, when starting ACP with palliative patients, we recommend starting with current issues. In doing so, a start can be made with future issues kept in view. Although the tension between ACP's focus on the patient's direction and the right not to know can be difficult, ACP has to be tailored to each individual patient.

Keywords: Advance care planning; General practice; Palliative medicine; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All interviewees gave verbal consent to participate and to record the interviews. The study was assessed (file number 2015–2145) not subject to the Medical Research (Human Subjects) Act by the medical ethics committee of the Radboud university medical center as it did not subject people to treatment or required people to behave in a particular way, and it took place within the GCP guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rietjens Judith A C, Sudore Rebecca L, Connolly Michael, van Delden Johannes J, Drickamer Margaret A, Droger Mirjam, van der Heide Agnes, Heyland Daren K, Houttekier Dirk, Janssen Daisy J A, Orsi Luciano, Payne Sheila, Seymour Jane, Jox Ralf J, Korfage Ida J. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. The Lancet Oncology. 2017;18(9):e543–e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Advance care planning and advance directives [https://www.uptodate.com/contents/advance-care-planning-and-advance-dire...].
    1. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1345. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1345. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Rietjens JA, van der Heide A. The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review. Palliat Med. 2014;28(8):1000–1025. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526272. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Houben CH, Spruit MA, Groenen MT, Wouters EF, Janssen DJ. Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(7):477–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types