Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):462.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2101-x.

Prevalence and determinants of antenatal depression among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence and determinants of antenatal depression among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abriham Zegeye et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Antenatal depression is more prevalent in low and middle income countries as compared to high income countries. It has now been documented as a global public health problem owing to its severity, chronic nature and recurrence as well as its negative influence on the general health of women and development of children. However, in Ethiopia, there are few studies with highly variable and inconsistent findings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of antenatal depression and its determinants among pregnant women in Ethiopia.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we exhaustively searched several databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct and Cochrane Library. To estimate the pooled prevalence, studies reporting the prevalence of antenatal depression and its determinants were included. Data were extracted using a standardized data extraction format prepared in Microsoft Excel and transferred to STATA 14 statistical software for analysis. To assess heterogeneity, the Cochrane Q test statistics and I2 test were used. Since the included studies exhibit considerable heterogeneity, a random effect meta- analysis model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of antenatal depression. Finally, the association between determinant factors and antenatal depression were assessed.

Results: The overall pooled prevalence of antenatal depression, in Ethiopia, was 24.2% (95% CI: 19.8, 28.6). The subgroup analysis of this study indicated that the highest prevalence was reported from Addis Ababa region with a prevalence of 26.9% (21.9-32.1) whereas the lowest prevalence was reported from Amhara region, 17.25 (95% CI: 6.34, 28.17). Presence of previous history of abortion (OR: 3.0, 95% CI: 2.1, 4.4), presence of marital conflict (OR: 7.2; 95% CI: 2.7, 19.0), lack of social support from husband (OR: 3.2: 95% CI: 1.2, 8.9), and previous history of pregnancy complication (OR: 3.2: 95% CI: 1.8, 5.8) were found to be determinants of antenatal depression.

Conclusion: The pooled prevalence of antenatal depression, in Ethiopia, was relatively high. Presence of previous history of abortion, presence of marital conflict, lack of social support from husband, presence of previous history of pregnancy complications were the main determinants of antenatal depression in Ethiopia.

Keywords: Antenatal depression; Determinants; Ethiopia; Prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow diagram showing the procedure of selecting studies for meta-analysis of prevalence and determinants of antenatal depression in Ethiopia, 2017
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The pooled prevalence of antenatal depression in Ethiopia, 2017
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Funnel plots to test the publication bias of the 10 studies
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Duval and Tweedie’s Trim and Fill analysis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot depicting pooled odds ratio (log scale) of the associations between antenatal depression and its purported determinants (a: previous history of abortion b: Presence of marital conflict c: lack of social support from husband d: previous history of pregnancy complication)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patel V, Rodrigues M, DeSouza N. Gender, poverty, and postnatal depression: a study of mothers in Goa, India. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(1):43–47. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.43. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the world health surveys. Lancet. 2007;370(9590):851–858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61415-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonari L, Pinto N, Ahn E, Einarson A, Steiner M, Koren G. Perinatal risks of untreated depression during pregnancy. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49(11):726–735. doi: 10.1177/070674370404901103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma V, Pope CJ. Pregnancy and bipolar disorder: a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(11):1447–1455. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07499. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eastwood J, Ogbo FA, Hendry A, Noble J, Page A, Group EYR The impact of antenatal depression on perinatal outcomes in Australian women. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169907. - DOI - PMC - PubMed