Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 29;5(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s40779-018-0188-z.

Stigma and its impact on the families of former soldiers of the German Armed Forces: an exploratory study

Affiliations

Stigma and its impact on the families of former soldiers of the German Armed Forces: an exploratory study

Katrin Schuy et al. Mil Med Res. .

Abstract

Background: Military families who have a family member with a mental illness see themselves confronted with many demands. Stigmatization is one of these challenges. Stigmatization affects not only the individual who suffers from a mental illness but also other family members via stigma by association and vicarious stigma. Stigma by association occurs when mental illness stigma spills over to individuals associated with an individual with a mental illness. Vicarious stigma describes the suffering of family members when they note the impact of stigma on their relative with mental illness. As a societal phenomenon, stigma plays out in social interactions and might therefore influence the social networks of families. It is also associated with healthcare utilization.

Method: Narrative interviews were conducted with 15 family members (partners, spouses, parents and children) of former soldiers of the German Armed Forces with a service-induced mental illness. The transcribed interview data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach, in which codes were formed and emerging themes were systemized. Relationships between stigma, the families' reactions to it, its effects on their social relationships and its interference with their healthcare utilization were analyzed.

Results: This study provides a detailed description of how relatives of former German soldiers with mental health problems experience stigma by association and vicarious stigma. Their perceptions are shown in a model that describes stigma-related attitudes, reactions to them and their effects on the social relationships of former soldiers' families. These families felt stigmatized because of the former soldiers' mental illness (mental illness stigma) and the military context in which it occurred (former soldier stigma). They reacted with nondisclosure, anger, acceptance and self-blame. Stigma was associated with smaller and weaker social networks that were characterized by social exclusion, self-segregation and conflicts with extended family, friends and colleagues. Stigma also affected the families' healthcare utilization.

Conclusions: Urgently needed anti-stigma campaigns, particularly in the civilian context, should address the stigmatization of both mental illness and the military participation of the families affected. They should consider the needs of both former soldiers with a mental illness and their families.

Keywords: Families; German Armed Forces; Mental illness; Stigma by association; Veteran; Vicarious stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Charité ethics committee (Approval Number: EA1/250/14).

Consent for publication

All participants provided their consent prior to participating in this study. The forms of consent can be provided.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Impact of stigma on social relationships perceived by interviewees

Similar articles

References

    1. Goldman HH. Mental illness and family burden: a public health perspective. Psychiatr Serv. 1982;33(7):557–560. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.7.557. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kjellin L, Östman M. Relatives of psychiatric inpatients–do physical violence and suicide attempts of patients influence family burden and participation in care? Nord J Psychiatry. 2005;59(1):7–11. doi: 10.1080/08039480510018850. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lefley HP. Family burden and family stigma in major mental illness. Am Psychol. 1989;44(3):556. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.556. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Östman M. Family burden and participation in care: differences between relatives of patients admitted to psychiatric care for the first time and relatives of re-admitted patients. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004;11(5):608–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2004.00771.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ostman M, Hansson L, Andersson K. Family burden, participation in care and mental health-an 11-year comparison of the situation of relatives to compulsorily and voluntarily admitted patients. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2000;46(3):191–200. doi: 10.1177/002076400004600305. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types