Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):119.
doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0436-8.

The financial sustainability of the World Health Organization and the political economy of global health governance: a review of funding proposals

Srikanth K Reddy  1 , Sumaira Mazhar  2 , Raphael Lencucha  3
Affiliations
Review

The financial sustainability of the World Health Organization and the political economy of global health governance: a review of funding proposals

Srikanth K Reddy et al. Global Health. .

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) continues to experience immense financial stress. The precarious financial situation of the WHO has given rise to extensive dialogue and debate. This dialogue has generated diverse technical proposals to remedy the financial woes of the WHO and is intimately tied to existential questions about the future of the WHO in global health governance. In this paper, we review, categorize, and synthesize the proposals for financial reform of the WHO. It appears that less contentious issues, such as convening financing dialogue and establishing a health emergency programme, received consensus from member states. However, member states are reluctant to increase the assessed annual contributions to the WHO, which weakens the prospect for greater autonomy for the organisation. The WHO remains largely supported by earmarked voluntary contributions from states and non-state actors. We argue that while financial reform requires institutional changes to enhance transparency, accountability and efficiency, it is also deeply tied to the political economy of state sovereignty and ideas about the leadership role of the WHO in a crowded global health governance context.

Keywords: Economy, Reform; Financing; Governance for health; International political; World Health Organization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

None required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that he/she has no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Kaiser Family Foundation. The U.S. Government and the World Health Organization. 2017. Available at: http://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-u-s-government-an....[accessed 02.06.2017].
    1. Forss K, Stenson B, Sterky G. The future of global health cooperation: designing a new World Health Organization. Current issues in public health. 1996;2(3):138–142. - PubMed
    1. Yach D. World Health Organization reform—a normative or an operational organization? American Public Health Association; 2016. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill PS. Understanding global health governance as a complex adaptive system. Global Public Health. 2011;6(6):593–605. doi: 10.1080/17441691003762108. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GHD-NET.org. WHO Reform. Available at: http://www.ghd-net.org/negotiations#more-35. [accessed 30.05.2017].

Publication types