Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 28;8(12):225.
doi: 10.3390/ani8120225.

Sheep Farmers' Perception of Welfare and Pain Associated with Routine Husbandry Practices in Chile

Affiliations

Sheep Farmers' Perception of Welfare and Pain Associated with Routine Husbandry Practices in Chile

Cristian Larrondo et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Considering the public concern about the welfare of farm animals during routine husbandry practices, this study aimed to determine how husbandry practices are carried out in Chilean farms, sheep farmers' perceptions of animal welfare and pain, and factors that affect them, as well as the level of agreement among farmers in the recognition of pain associated with these practices. Using a self-administered survey, participants were asked about their sociodemographic information, how husbandry practices are carried out in their farms, and their pain perception for seven of these common husbandry procedures using a numerical rating scale (0 to 10). A total of 165 farmers completed the survey and perceived castration and tail docking as the most painful practices in lambs (median pain score 10 vs. 8, p < 0.05). Pain perception was associated with the method used for the specific husbandry practices, the farmers' educational level, the farm size, and flock size (p < 0.05). There was a fair to good level of agreement beyond chance (p < 0.05) in the recognition of pain associated with the most painful practices. In general, husbandry practices are not carried out in young animals, use painful methods, without using analgesics, which may have a negative impact on animal welfare.

Keywords: Animal welfare; agreement; husbandry practices; lambs; pain; perception; sheep farmers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median pain scores associated to husbandry practices in lambs using a numerical rating scale, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Association for the Study of Pain . Part III: Pain Terms, A Current List with Definitions and Notes on Usage. In: Merskey H., Bogduk N., editors. IASP Task Force on Taxonomy. IASP Press; Seattle, WA, USA: 2012. pp. 209–214.
    1. Fitzpatrick J., Scott M., Nolan A. Assessment of pain and welfare of sheep. Small Rum. Res. 2006;62:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.07.028. - DOI
    1. Molony V., Kent J. Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements. J. Anim. Sci. 1997;75:266–272. doi: 10.2527/1997.751266x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McLennam K. Why pain is still a welfare issue for farm animals, and how facial expression could be the answer. Agriculture. 2018;8:127. doi: 10.3390/agriculture8080127. - DOI
    1. Gallo C., Tarumán J., Larrondo C. Main factors affecting animal welfare and meat quality in lambs for slaughter in Chile. Animals. 2018;8:165. doi: 10.3390/ani8100165. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources