Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 28;6(4):160.
doi: 10.3390/sports6040160.

Effects of Adding Single Joint Exercises to a Resistance Training Programme in Trained Women

Affiliations

Effects of Adding Single Joint Exercises to a Resistance Training Programme in Trained Women

Matheus Barbalho et al. Sports (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: The present study's aim was to compare the changes in muscle performance and anthropometric measures in trained women performing RT programs composed only of MJ exercises or programmes that involve the addition of SJ exercises.

Methods: Seventeen trained women were randomised to MJ or MJ+SJ. Both groups performed the same MJ exercises following a nonlinear periodisation model for 8 weeks. The only difference was that the MJ+SJ group also performed SJ exercises. The participants were tested for 10 repetition maximum (10 RM), flexed arm circumference, and both biceps and triceps skinfold.

Results: Both groups significantly increased 10 RM load for the bench press (12.6% MJ and 9.2% MJ+SJ), triceps (15.6% MJ and 17.9% MJ+SJ), pull down (9.8% MJ and 8.3% MJ+SJ), biceps (14.0% MJ and 13.0% MJ+SJ), leg press (15.2% MJ and 12.8% MJ+SJ) and knee extension (10.2% MJ and 9.1% MJ+SJ). The decreases in triceps (-5.1% MJ and -5.3% MJ+SJ) and biceps (-6.5% MJ and -5.7% MJ+SJ) skinfolds were also significant as were the increases in arm circumference (1.47% MJ and 1.58% MJ+SJ). In all tests there was nothing significantly different between groups.

Conclusions: The use of SJ exercises as a complement to a RT programme containing MJ exercises brings no additional benefit to trained women.

Keywords: exercise selection; isolation exercise; muscle hypertrophy; strength training; training volume.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gentil P., Steele J., Pereira M.C., Castanheira R.P., Paoli A., Bottaro M. Comparison of upper body strength gains between men and women after 10 weeks of resistance training. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1627. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1627. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu J., Lombardi G., Jiao W., Banfi G. Effects of Exercise on Bone Status in Female Subjects, from Young Girls to Postmenopausal Women: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Sports Med. 2016;46:1165–1182. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0494-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perales M., Santos-Lozano A., Ruiz J.R., Lucia A., Barakat R. Benefits of aerobic or resistance training during pregnancy on maternal health and perinatal outcomes: A systematic review. Early Hum. Dev. 2016;94:43–48. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.01.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paoli A., Moro T., Bianco A. Lift weights to fight overweight. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging. 2015;35:1–6. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbalho M.S.M., Gentil P., Izquierdo M., Fisher J., Steele J., Raiol R.A. There are no no-responders to low or high resistance training volumes among older women. Exp. Gerontol. 2017;99:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.09.003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources