An abridged Spanish version of Sexual Double Standard Scale: Factorial structure, reliability and validity evidence
- PMID: 30487912
- PMCID: PMC6220910
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.05.003
An abridged Spanish version of Sexual Double Standard Scale: Factorial structure, reliability and validity evidence
Abstract
Sexual double standard (SDS) has long been associated to several dimensions of sexual health. Therefore the assessment of SDS is relevant and requires self-reported measures with adequate psychometric properties. This study aims to adapt the Sexual Double Standard Scale (SDSS) into heterosexual Spanish population and examine its psychometric properties. Method: Using quota incidental sampling, we recruited a sample of 1,206 individuals (50% women), distributed across three groups based on their age (18-34, 35-49 and 50 years old and older). Results: We performed both, Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. An abridged version was yielded, consisting of 16 items distributed into two factors (Acceptance for sexual freedom and Acceptance for sexual shyness). A second-order factor structure was also adequate, which facilitates the use of a global index for SDS. Reliability, based on internal consistency and temporal stability was good for the factors. Evidence of validity is also shown and reported. Conclusions: This adapted version of the SDSS is reliable and valid. The importance for its use to estimate the prevalence of both traditional and modern forms of this phenomenon is discussed.
El doble estándar sexual (DES) se ha asociado a distintas dimensiones de la salud sexual, por lo que su evaluación es relevante y requiere de instrumentos con adecuadas propiedades psicométricas. Se plantea la adaptación a población heterosexual española de la Sexual Double Standard Scale (SDSS) y examinar sus propiedades psicométricas. Método: Mediante un muestreo incidental por cuotas se obtuvo una muestra de 1.206 sujetos (50% mujeres), distribuidos en tres grupos en función de la edad (18-34 años, 35-49 años y 50 años o más). Resultados: Mediante Análisis Factorial Exploratorio y Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio se consiguió una versión de 16 ítems distribuidos en dos factores (Aceptación de la libertad sexual y Aceptación del recato sexual), cuya combinación en un factor de segundo orden permite obtener un índice global de doble estándar sexual. La fiabilidad de consistencia interna y test-retest es óptima para los dos subfactores y sus medidas presentan adecuados índices de validez. Conclusiones: Esta versión adaptada de la SDSS es fiable y válida. Se discute su importancia para detectar la prevalencia de DES tradicional y de expresiones más modernas de este fenómeno.
Keywords: Instrumental study; Reliability; Sexual Double Standard Scale; Sexual double standard; Validity.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sexual Double Standard: A Psychometric Study From a Macropsychological Perspective Among the Spanish Heterosexual Population.Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 14;10:1869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01869. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31474909 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric Properties of the Orgasm Rating Scale in Context of Sexual Relationship in a Spanish Sample.J Sex Med. 2018 May;15(5):741-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 30. J Sex Med. 2018. PMID: 29606627 Clinical Trial.
-
Spanish version of the Sexual Excitation/Sexual Inhibition Inventory for Women: Factorial structure, reliability and validity evidences.Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2017 Jan-Apr;17(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 27. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2017. PMID: 30487882 Free PMC article.
-
Invariance of Spanish version of Sexual Double Standard Scale across sex, age, and education level.Psicothema. 2019 Nov;31(4):465-474. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.102. Psicothema. 2019. PMID: 31634093
-
Invariance of the Sexual Double Standard Scale: A Cross-Cultural Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 29;17(5):1569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051569. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32121338 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Individual, Relational, and Sociocultural Determinants of Sexual Function and Sexual Satisfaction in Ecuador.Sex Med. 2021 Apr;9(2):100307. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100307. Epub 2021 Mar 12. Sex Med. 2021. PMID: 33721691 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the Orgasm Rating Scale in Context of Sexual Relationships of Gay and Lesbian Adults.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;19(2):887. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020887. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35055709 Free PMC article.
-
Are Gender Identities and Gender Ideologies Associated with the Variety and Type of Owned Sex Toys? Evidence from a Large Italian Sample of Cisgender Individuals.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Aug;53(8):3043-3060. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02944-z. Epub 2024 Jul 16. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 39014277
-
Factorial invariance, differential item functioning, and norms of the Orgasm Rating Scale.Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2019 Jan;19(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 28. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30619498 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Sexual Attitudes with Sexual Function: General vs. Specific Attitudes.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 2;18(19):10390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910390. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34639691 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allison R., Risman B.J. A double standard for “Hooking Up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research. 2013;42:1191–1206. - PubMed
-
- Bermúdez M.P., Castro A., Gude F., Buela-Casal G. Relationship power in the couple and sexual double standard as predictors of the risk of sexually transmitted infections and HIV: Multicultural and gender differences. Current HIV Research. 2010;8:172–178. - PubMed
-
- Bermúdez M.P., Ramiro M.T., Sierra J.C., Buela-Casal G. Construcción de un índice de riesgo para la infección por el VIH y su relación con la doble moral y el poder diádico en adolescentes. Anales de Psicología. 2013;29:917–922.
-
- Boone T.L., Lefkowitz E.S. Safer sex and the health belief model: Considering the contributions of peer norms and socialization factors. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality. 2004;16:51–68.
-
- Bordini G.S., Sperb T.M. Sexual double standard: A review of the literature between 2001 and 2010. Sexuality & Culture. 2013;17:686–704.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources