Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2018 Oct 23:9:211.
doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_490_17. eCollection 2018.

Lumbar epidural analgesia for labor in a parturient with a history of surgery for lumbar intradural ependymoma: Literature review and case presentation

Affiliations
Case Reports

Lumbar epidural analgesia for labor in a parturient with a history of surgery for lumbar intradural ependymoma: Literature review and case presentation

Ramsis F Ghaly et al. Surg Neurol Int. .

Abstract

Background: Ependymomas represent 50-60% of all brain and central nervous system tumors. Previous lumbar spine surgery for resection of an ependymoma should not be considered a relative contraindication for the administration of epidural/subarachnoid anesthesia to patients in labor.

Case description: A 34-year-old G1P0, who underwent resection of an L1-L3 intramedullary ependymoma 8 years previously, presented in active labor with residual left leg numbness and tingling. The lumbar magnetic resonance imaging showed scar tissue and the L1-L3 laminectomy defect. With the acute onset of labor pain, the patient underwent continuous lumbar epidural analgesia; the epidural catheter was placed at the L5-S1 level. The patient underwent an emergency cesarean section with surgical anesthesia being attained up to a T4 dermatomal sensory level.

Conclusions: Neuraxial anesthesia can be performed safely in patients who have previously undergone lumbar resections of intradural ependymomas. However, the anesthesiologist should place the epidural needle/catheter at a nonoperative level (e.g. above/below). Furthermore, epidural local anesthetics and opioids, as in this case, placed at the L5-S1 level below an L1-L3 prior surgical scar, may diffuse intradurally, bypassing the obliterated surgical epidural space and/or attendant scar tissue.

Keywords: Ependymomas; epidural analgesia; labor; scar tissue; spinal analgesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bajaj P. Regional anaesthesia in a patient with pre-existing neurological dysfunction. Indian J Anaesth. 2009;53:135–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauchat JR, McCarthy RJ, Koski TR, Cambic CR, Lee AI, Wong CA. Prior lumbar discectomy surgery does not alter the efficacy of neuraxial labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2012;115:348–53. - PubMed
    1. Becker DE, Reed KL. Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology. Anesth Prog. 2006;53:98–109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daley MD, Rolbin SH, Hew EM, Morningstar BA, Stewart JA. Epidural anesthesia for obstetrics after spinal surgery. Reg Anesth. 1990;15:280–4. - PubMed
    1. Eisenach JC, Hood DD, Curry R, Shafer SL. Cephalad movement of morphine and fentanyl in humans after intrathecal injection. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:166–73. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources