Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Aug;29(8):4133-4140.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5832-1. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Histogram analysis of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging: comparison of glioblastoma and solitary brain metastasis in enhancing tumors and peritumoral regions

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Histogram analysis of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging: comparison of glioblastoma and solitary brain metastasis in enhancing tumors and peritumoral regions

Kiyohisa Kamimura et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Differentiation of glioblastomas (GBMs) and solitary brain metastases (SBMs) is an important clinical problem. The aim of this study was to determine whether amide proton transfer-weighted (APTW) imaging is useful for distinguishing GBMs from SBMs.

Methods: We examined 31 patients with GBM and 17 with SBM. For each tumor, enhancing areas (EAs) and surrounding non-enhancing areas with T2-prolongation (peritumoral high signal intensity areas, PHAs) were manually segmented using fusion images of the post-contrast T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. The mean amide proton transfer signal intensities (APTSIs) were compared among the EAs, PHAs, and contralateral normal appearing white matter (NAWM) within each tumor type. Furthermore, we analyzed APTSI histograms to compare the EAs and PHAs of GBMs and SBMs.

Results: In GBMs, the mean APTSI in EAs (2.92 ± 0.74%) was the highest, followed by that in PHAs (1.64 ± 0.83%, p < 0.001) and NAWM (0.43 ± 0.83%, p < 0.001). In SBMs, the mean APTSI in EAs (1.85 ± 0.99%) and PHAs (1.42 ± 0.45%) were significantly higher than that in NAWM (0.42 ± 0.30%, p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was found between EAs and PHAs. The mean and 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles for APT in EAs of GBMs were significantly higher than those of SBMs. However, no significant difference was found between GBMs and SBMs in any histogram parameters for PHA.

Conclusions: APTSI in EAs, but not PHAs, is useful for differentiation between GBMs and SBMs.

Key points: • Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and histogram analysis in the enhancing tumor can provide useful information for differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastasis. • Amide proton transfer signal intensity histogram parameters from peritumoral areas showed no significant difference between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastasis. • Vasogenic edema alone can substantially increase amide proton transfer signal intensity which may mimic tumor invasion.

Keywords: Glioblastoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metastasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2001 Jan;3(1):89-99 - PubMed
    1. Nat Med. 2003 Aug;9(8):1085-90 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Med. 2003 Dec;50(6):1120-6 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):997-1003 - PubMed
    1. Acta Neuropathol. 2005 Nov;110(5):435-42 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources