Relationships among subjective patient-reported outcome, quality of life, and objective gait characteristics using wearable foot inertial-sensor assessment in foot-ankle patients
- PMID: 30488138
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2346-0
Relationships among subjective patient-reported outcome, quality of life, and objective gait characteristics using wearable foot inertial-sensor assessment in foot-ankle patients
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to determine the relationships between subjective validated patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life, to objective gait characteristics in patients with foot-ankle conditions. Objective gait characteristics were obtained using a wearable foot inertial-sensor device as well as by assessing the relationships between spatiotemporal or gait parameters by analyzing the inter-metric correlations.
Methods: Fifty-two patients with foot-ankle conditions (37 women/15 men, aged 21-75 years) were included in this study. Clinical assessments, including evaluations of validated patient-reported outcomes using visual analog scale foot and ankle score, health-related quality of life using validated Short Form-36, and gait characteristics using a wearable foot inertial-sensor device, were performed and recorded for each patient.
Results: A significant negative correlation was observed between the physical component summary (PCS) and maximal cadence (r = - 0.308, P = 0.025). Significant positive correlations were noted between mean walking speed and mean cadence (r = 0.776, P < 0.001) and between maximal walking speed and mean step length (r = 0.498, P < 0.001). Significant negative correlations were found between the mean cadence and mean step length (r = - 0.491, P < 0.001) and between maximal cadence and mean step length (r = - 0.355, P = 0.009).
Conclusions: Cadence is an important objective spatiotemporal parameter to assess in foot and ankle patients as it relates well to outcome, with a significantly negatively correlation to subjectively reported PCS in health-related quality of life. Based on inter-metric relationships, an increased cadence might be used to maintain walking speed as a compensatory mechanism in patients with foot-ankle conditions.
Keywords: Foot and ankle pathology; Gait; Patient-reported outcome measures; Wearable electronic device.
Similar articles
-
What features of the built environment matter most for mobility? Using wearable sensors to capture real-time outdoor environment demand on gait performance.Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:437-442. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.028. Epub 2018 Dec 20. Gait Posture. 2019. PMID: 30594872
-
Do orthopaedic shoes improve local dynamic stability of gait? An observational study in patients with chronic foot and ankle injuries.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Mar 14;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-94. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013. PMID: 23496924 Free PMC article.
-
Gait and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Comparative Gait Analysis Study Using Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 9;9(11):e27087. doi: 10.2196/27087. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34751663 Free PMC article.
-
Foot and ankle biomechanics.Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2003 Mar;7(1):67-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41086. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2003. PMID: 12888945 Review.
-
Digital Biomarkers of Gait and Balance in Diabetic Foot, Measurable by Wearable Inertial Measurement Units: A Mini Review.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;22(23):9278. doi: 10.3390/s22239278. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36501981 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Gait metrics analysis utilizing single-point inertial measurement units: a systematic review.Mhealth. 2022 Jan 20;8:9. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-21-17. eCollection 2022. Mhealth. 2022. PMID: 35178440 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources