Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Apr;38(4):1047-1054.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4368-8. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Combined immunosuppressive treatment (CIST) in lupus nephritis: a multicenter, randomized controlled study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Combined immunosuppressive treatment (CIST) in lupus nephritis: a multicenter, randomized controlled study

Yuan An et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The standard strategy for treating lupus nephritis comprises glucocorticoids together with either intravenous cyclophosphamide or oral mycophenolate mofetil, but the low remission rate is still a challenge in practice. This study was aimed to seek higher remission rate of lupus nephritis using a combined strategy.

Method: A 24-week trial was conducted in 17 rheumatology or nephrology centers in China. A total of 191 lupus nephritis patients were randomized to follow a combined immunosuppressive treatment (CIST) with intravenous cyclophosphamide, an oral immunosuppressive agent, namely mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine or leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine (n = 95), or receive intravenous cyclophosphamide alone (n = 96) for 24 weeks. Glucocorticoid was given to both groups. The primary end point was a complete remission with a most stringent standard as proteinuria < 150 mg per 24 h, normal urinary sediment, serum albumin, and renal function at 24 weeks. The secondary end point was treatment failure at 24 weeks.

Results: At week 24, both the rate of complete remission (39.5%) and total response (87.2%) was higher in the combined group, compared with CYC group (20.8% and 68.8%, p < 0.05). The cumulative probability of complete remission was also higher in the combined group (p = 0.013). In addition, the combined treatment was superior to routine CYC with less treatment failure (12.8% vs.31.2%, p < 0.001). No difference was found between the incidences of severe adverse events in the two arms: 3.2% (3/95 combined group) vs.4.2% (4/96 CYC group).

Conclusion: Treatment with a combined immunosuppressive agent is superior to routine CYC only therapy in lupus nephritis.

Keywords: Immunosuppressive agents; Lupus nephritis; Remission inducing; Systemic lupus erythematosus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 May;20(5):1103-12 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 2000 Aug;27(8):1892-5 - PubMed
    1. Lupus. 2008 Jul;17(7):638-44 - PubMed
    1. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Feb;57(2):235-44 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Apr;46(4):995-1002 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources