Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Fall;27(3):219-225.

Influence of Level 1 Evidence on Management of Clavicle and Distal Humerus Fractures: A Nationwide Comparative Study of Records From 2005 to 2014

Jennifer Kurowicki  1 , Jacob J Triplet  2 , Samuel Rosas  3 , Tsun Yee Law  4 , Timothy Niedzielak  5 , Enesi Momoh  6 , Jonathan C Levy  6
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Influence of Level 1 Evidence on Management of Clavicle and Distal Humerus Fractures: A Nationwide Comparative Study of Records From 2005 to 2014

Jennifer Kurowicki et al. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2018 Fall.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine alterations in national trends managing midshaft clavicle fractures (MCF) and intra-articular distal humerus fractures (DHF) surrounding recent level 1 publications. A retrospective review of the PearlDiver supercomputer for DHF and MCF was performed. Using age limits defined in the original level 1 studies, total use and annual use rates were examined. Nonoperative management and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were reviewed for MCF. ORIF and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) were reviewed for DHF. A query yielded 4929 MCF and 106,535 DHF patients. A significant increase in ORIF use for MCF following the publication of the level 1 study (p = .002) and a strong, positive correlation (p = .007) were evident. Annual TEA (p = .515) use for DHF was not observed. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(3):219-225, 2018).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All work was performed at the Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute and Holy Cross Hospital.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
DHF visits and treatment in Medicare population.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Midshaft clavicle fractures for ages 15 to 59.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89:1–10, 2007. - PubMed
    1. Navarro RA, Gelber JD, Harrast JJ, et al. Frequency and complications after operative fixation of clavicular fractures. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 25(5):e125–e129, 2016. - PubMed
    1. Yang S, Werner BC, Gwathmey FW Jr. Treatment trends in adolescent clavicle fractures. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 35:229–233, 2015. - PubMed
    1. Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Lepola V, et al. Surgical treatment of clavicular fractures in Finland - a register based study between 1987 and 2010. Injury 44:1899–1903, 2013. - PubMed
    1. McKee MD, Veillette CJH, Hall JA, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction–internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 18:3–12, 2009. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms