Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;92(1094):20180637.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180637. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

UK national audit of safety checks for radiology interventions

Timothy Ariyanayagam  1 , Karl Drinkwater  2 , Neil Cozens  3 , David Howlett  2   4 , Paul Malcolm  1
Affiliations

UK national audit of safety checks for radiology interventions

Timothy Ariyanayagam et al. Br J Radiol. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Objective:: To reaudit the use of safety checklists in radiology departments in NHS departments throughout the UK.

Methods:: This audit was performed on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists Audit Committee in 2016 and was sent to radiology audit leads at every NHS department in the UK to determine the use of safety checks in various modalities and subspecialties. Free-form text boxes gathered data on problems with checklist implementation.

Results:: 109/177 (62%) trusts responded. 48% of respondents used safety checklists for all radiological procedures in all modalities. 50% used checklists for some procedures. 2% did not use a checklist. Checklist use had increased since the previous audit (98% 2016, compared to 94% in 2012) but implementation for different procedures remains variable. For example, in ultrasound-guided fine needle and breast stereotactic procedures (49%), use has not increased since 2012.

Conclusion:: Reasons for not using checklists include a perception that intervention suite checklists were not appropriate for minor procedures and the limited flexibility of radiology information systems. The limitations of checklists are discussed.

Advances in knowledge:: Our reaudit shows that in spite of increased implementation, use of safety checks is variable. Local ownership and radiology information system flexibility are needed to support the culture of safety processes in radiology departments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Modified WHO safety checklist.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Provision of intervention and information leaflets by modality.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Checklist use for invasive procedures by department.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Use of written or verbal consent.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
User recommendations for inclusion in intervention records.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Example electronic Radiology Information System modified WHO checklist.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schamel J. How the pilot’s checklist came about. Officer Rev Mag 2010; 50: 16.
    1. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 491–9. - PubMed
    1. de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RMPH, den Outer AJ, van Andel G, van Helden SH, et al. Effect of a Comprehensive Surgical Safety System on Patient Outcomes. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2010; 363: 1928–37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0911535 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Alert National Patient Safety Agency & National Reporting and Learning Service Issue date: 26 January 2009, Reference number 0861, Central Alert System (CAS) reference NPSA/2009/PSA002/U1, DH Gateway reference: 11146..
    1. The Royal College of Radiologists Guidelines for Radiologists in implementing the NPSA Safe Surgery requirement. London: The British Institute of Radiology.; 2009.