Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus levamisole in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: an open-label randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Both levamisole and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prevent relapses in patients with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome; however, their efficacy has not been compared prospectively. This single-center, randomized, open-label trial enrolled 149 children ages 6-18 years with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive therapy with MMF (750-1000 mg/m² daily) or levamisole (2-2.5 mg/kg on alternate days) for 1 year; prednisolone was discontinued by 2-3 months. In intention-to-treat analyses, the frequency of relapse was similar between participants treated with MMF and levamisole (mean difference -0.29 relapses/patient-year; 95% confidence interval -0.65, 0.08). Relapse rates declined to almost one-third of baseline for both treatment groups. Therapy with MMF was not superior to levamisole in terms of the proportions of participants with sustained remission (40.8% vs. 34.2%), frequent relapses (14.5% vs. 16.4%), or treatment failure, a composite outcome of frequent relapses, steroid resistance, or significant steroid toxicity (15.8% vs. 20.6%). These outcomes were also similar in time to event analyses. Changes in anthropometry and blood pressure were similar between the groups, and the rates of adverse effects were low in both groups. Flow cytometry in 32 participants demonstrated similar proportions of B cells and CD4+, CD8+, T helper (Th)1, Th2, Th17, and T regulatory (Treg) cells during follow-up. Therapy with MMF was not superior to levamisole in the frequency of relapses, likelihood of sustained remission or corticosteroid sparing in children with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Registration CTRI/2012/02/002394.

Keywords: lymphocyte subsets; minimal change disease; steroid dependence.