Textbook Outcomes Among Medicare Patients Undergoing Hepatopancreatic Surgery
- PMID: 30499800
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003105
Textbook Outcomes Among Medicare Patients Undergoing Hepatopancreatic Surgery
Abstract
Objective: To define and test "Textbook Outcome" (TO)-a composite measure for healthcare quality-among Medicare patients undergoing hepatopancreatic resections. Hospital variation in TO and Medicare payments were analyzed.
Background: Composite measures of quality may be superior to individual measures for the analysis of hospital performance.
Methods: The Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) Inpatient Files were reviewed to identify Medicare patients who underwent pancreatic and liver procedures between 2013 and 2015. TO was defined as: no postoperative surgical complications, no prolonged length of hospital stay, no readmission ≤ 90 days after discharge, and no postoperative mortality ≤ 90 days after surgery. Medicare payments were compared among patients who achieved TO versus patients who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate patient factors associated with TO. A nomogram to predict probability of TO was developed and validated.
Results: TO was achieved in 44% (n = 5919) of 13,467 patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery. Adjusted TO rates at the hospital level varied from 11.1% to 69.6% for pancreatic procedures and from 16.6% to 78.7% for liver procedures. Prolonged length of hospital stay represented the major obstacle to achieve TO. Average Medicare payments were substantially higher among patients who did not have a TO. Factors associated with TO on multivariable analysis were age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, previous hospital admissions, procedure type, and surgical approach (all P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Less than one-half of Medicare patients achieved a TO following hepatopancreatic procedures with a wide variation in the rates of TO among hospitals. There was a discrepancy in Medicare payments for patients who achieved a TO versus patients who did not. TO could be useful for the public reporting of patient level hospital performance and hospital variation.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
-
- Parina RP, Chang DC, Rose JA, et al. Is a low readmission rate indicative of a good hospital? J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220:169–176.
-
- Merath K, Bagante F, Chen Q, et al. The impact of discharge timing on readmission following hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a nationwide readmission database analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; Epub ahead of print.
-
- Kneuertz PJ, Pitt HA, Bilimoria KY, et al. Risk of morbidity and mortality following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:1727–1735.
-
- Gani F, Lucas DJ, Kim Y, et al. Understanding variation in 30-day surgical readmission in the era of accountable care: effect of the patient, surgeon, and surgical subspecialties. JAMA Surg 2015; 150:1042–1049.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
