Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;26(9):1148-1153.
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

Quantitative Assessment of Bladder Cancer Reflects Grade and Recurrence: Comparing of Three Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for ADC Measurements at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging

Affiliations

Quantitative Assessment of Bladder Cancer Reflects Grade and Recurrence: Comparing of Three Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for ADC Measurements at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging

Hongyi Li et al. Acad Radiol. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the impact of three different regions of interests (ROIs) positioning methods for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements on the assessment of the grade and recurrence and to examine the correlation between ADC value and histopathological grade/ Ki-67 labeling index (LI) in patients with bladder cancer.

Materials and methods: Sixty-one patients with bladder cancer were retrospectively evaluated. Two observers measured mean ADC values using whole-volume-ROIs, single-section-ROI and three-ROIs methods. Interclass correlation coefficient was analyzed to assess interobserver variability. The grade and recurrence in patients with bladder cancer were assessed by calculating the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves with Az values. Spearman's correlation was used to analyze the correlations of ADC value with grade and Ki-67 LI.

Results: For the mean ADC value, the interclass correlation coefficient were excellent with the whole-volume and the single-section method (0.90 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.94] and 0.89 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.93]) and was good with the three-ROIs method (0.72 [95% CI: 0.53, 0.83]). The Az value for determining histological grade and recurrence of bladder cancer were not significantly different from each positioning method (all p > 0.05). There's significant correlation between histological grade and ADC measuring by whole-volume-ROIs and single-section-ROI methods (r = 0.31, p = 0.02; r = 0.37, p < 0.05). The ADC measured by whole-volume-ROIs, single-section-ROI, and three-ROIs methods were significantly and inversely correlated with the Ki-67 LI (r = -0.3; r = -0.49; r = -0.40, all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: There's no significant difference among any of the ROI positioning methods in evaluation of tumor grade and recurrence. There's significant correlation between histological grade and ADC measuring by whole-volume-ROIs and single-section-ROI methods. The ADC value obtained by either of three methods was significantly and inversely correlated with the Ki-67 LI.

Keywords: Apparent diffusion coefficient; Bladder cancer; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Ki-67 antigen; Neoplasm grading; Neoplasm recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources