Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):168-176.
doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.168.

Molecular monitoring in CML: how deep? How often? How should it influence therapy?

Affiliations
Review

Molecular monitoring in CML: how deep? How often? How should it influence therapy?

Naranie Shanmuganathan et al. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. .

Abstract

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the goals of therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are steadily shifting. Long-term disease control on TKI therapy has been the goal and expectation for most patients. More recently, treatment-free remission (TFR) has entered mainstream practice and is increasingly being adopted as the main goal of therapy. This therapeutic shift not only influences TKI selection but also, has necessitated the refinement and dissemination of highly sensitive and accurate molecular monitoring techniques. Measurement of BCR-ABL1 messenger RNA expression through reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, reported according to the International Scale, has become the primary tool for response assessment in CML. Achieving specific time-dependent molecular milestones, as defined by global therapeutic guidelines, has been established as critical in maximizing optimal outcomes while identifying patients at risk of therapy failure. Depth and duration of a deep molecular response have become the new therapeutic targets in patients considered for TFR. Consequently, molecular monitoring in CML has become even more critical to ongoing response assessment, identifying patients with TKI resistance and poor drug adherence, and enabling TFR to be attempted safely and effectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: N.S. has received honoraria from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Janssen. T.P.H. has received research funding and honoraria and consulted for Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Ariad.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Molecular profile of 15 patients at our institution attempting and failing TFR. (A) Molecular relapse after TKI cessation. (B) Molecular response after TKI recommencement. Blue indicates typical molecular responses showing rapid rise or decline. Red indicates typical molecular responses showing slow rise or decline.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guo JQ, Lin H, Kantarjian H, et al. . Comparison of competitive-nested PCR and real-time PCR in detecting BCR-ABL fusion transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Leukemia. 2002;16(12):2447-2453. - PubMed
    1. Burmeister T, Reinhardt R. A multiplex PCR for improved detection of typical and atypical BCR-ABL fusion transcripts. Leuk Res. 2008;32(4):579-585. - PubMed
    1. Mori S, Vagge E, le Coutre P, et al. . Age and dPCR can predict relapse in CML patients who discontinued imatinib: the ISAV study. Am J Hematol. 2015;90(10):910-914. - PubMed
    1. Cross NCP, White HE, Colomer D, et al. . Laboratory recommendations for scoring deep molecular responses following treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2015;29(5):999-1003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ross DM, Branford S, Moore S, Hughes TP. Limited clinical value of regular bone marrow cytogenetic analysis in imatinib-treated chronic phase CML patients monitored by RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL. Leukemia. 2006;20(4):664-670. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms