Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 30;9(1):5103.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07461-x.

Adipocyte OGT governs diet-induced hyperphagia and obesity

Affiliations

Adipocyte OGT governs diet-induced hyperphagia and obesity

Min-Dian Li et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Palatable foods (fat and sweet) induce hyperphagia, and facilitate the development of obesity. Whether and how overnutrition increases appetite through the adipose-to-brain axis is unclear. O-linked beta-D-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) transferase (OGT) couples nutrient cues to O-GlcNAcylation of intracellular proteins at serine/threonine residues. Chronic dysregulation of O-GlcNAc signaling contributes to metabolic diseases. Here we show that adipocyte OGT is essential for high fat diet-induced hyperphagia, but is dispensable for baseline food intake. Adipocyte OGT stimulates hyperphagia by transcriptional activation of de novo lipid desaturation and accumulation of N-arachidonyl ethanolamine (AEA), an endogenous appetite-inducing cannabinoid (CB). Pharmacological manipulation of peripheral CB1 signaling regulates hyperphagia in an adipocyte OGT-dependent manner. These findings define adipocyte OGT as a fat sensor that regulates peripheral lipid signals, and uncover an unexpected adipose-to-brain axis to induce hyperphagia and obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Adipocyte OGT drives diet-induced hyperphagia and obesity. a Genetic cross scheme. b Growth curves and c body composition of adipocyte-specific OGT knockout mice (FKO) and littermate control mice (Con) on chow (n = 8 (Con, dashed line with empty square/stripped bar) or 11 (FKO, blue line/bar)) or HFD (n = 11 (Con, dashed line with empty circle/empty bar) or 13 (FKO, red line/bar)). d Circulating levels of leptin and e wet tissue weights in male Con (n = 6) and FKO (n = 6) mice fed HFD for 9 weeks, or age-matched Con (n = 8) and FKO (n = 8) mice fed chow. BAT, interscapular brown adipose tissue. White adipose tissues include depots from perigonadal (pg), subcutaneous (sc), and retroperitoneal (rp) regions. f Energy intake of male mice on HFD (n = 7 per genotype) or Chow (n = 5 (Con) or n = 6 (FKO)) for 13 weeks. g Fecal energy content. h Daily energy intake. Male Con (n = 10) and FKO (n = 10) mice fed HFD for 6 weeks. i Energy expenditure of 5-week HFD-fed male Con (n = 7) and FKO (n = 9) mice. j Energy intake in a two-choice diet preference test. Male Con (n = 9) and FKO (n = 10) mice have been fed HFD for 7 or 16 weeks. k Growth curves of HFD-fed mice. Con (AL, ad libitum, n = 11), Con (PF, pair-fed to littermate FKO, n = 7), FKO (AL, n = 7). Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001, ****P< 0.0001, post hoc Sidak’s tests (b (HFD Con vs. HFD FKO), i, k (Con PF vs. FKO AL)), Tukey’s tests (c, d, f), or two-tailed Student’s t-test (e, g, h, j)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adipocyte OGT drives diet-induced insulin resistance through obesity. a Basal insulin levels, glucose levels, HOMA-IR values in male Con (n = 5) and FKO (n = 5) mice fed HFD for 11 weeks. b Serum levels of free fatty acids (FFA). Mean ± s.e.m.: 466.4 ± 6.4 μM (Con, n = 7) vs. 437.8 ± 7.5 μM (FKO, n = 7). c Blood glucose response to intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test in male Con (n = 5) and FKO (n = 5) mice fed HFD for 12 weeks. d, e Blood glucose (d) or blood insulin (e) response to intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (GTT) in male Con (n = 5) and FKO (n = 5) mice fed HFD for 11 weeks. f Levels of triacylglycerol (TAG) and diacylglycerol (DAG) in livers of Con (n = 7) and FKO (n = 7) mice fed HFD for 22 weeks. g, h Blood glucose response to GTT (g), and basal insulin levels (h) in pair-fed (PF) Con (n = 7) and ad libitum (AL) FKO (n = 7) mice fed HFD for 9 weeks. Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, two-tailed Student’s t-test (a, b, f, h), or post hoc Sidak’s tests (ce, g)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Transcriptomic and lipidomic analysis of adipose tissue from OGT FKO mice. a Pathway enrichment analysis of perigonadal white adipose tissue (pgWAT) from male Con (n = 5) and FKO (n = 3) mice fed HFD for 3 days. One hundred and thirty-four genes downregulated by OGT depletion were analyzed in the DAVID 7.8 platform. b Graph showing top 10 downregulated genes in adipose tissue. FC, fold-change of signals in FKO divided by signals in Con. c Heatmap of TAG lipid species in adipose tissue lipidome. Data were presented as log2 ratios of FKO/Con (Chow for 14–15 weeks, Con n = 11, FKO n = 6; age-matched HFD for 9 weeks, Con n = 7, FKO n = 8). d, e Content of major fatty acids in DAG and TAG in adipose tissue from chow-fed mice (n = 11 Con; n = 6 FKO), and lipid desaturation indexes (16:1/16:0, 18:1/18:0). f, g Heatmap (f) and Bar graphs (g) of the long-chain acyl-carnitine (CAR) profile of adipose tissue from mice described in panel (d, e). Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m. *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 two-tailed Student’s t-test (d, e), or post hoc Sidak’s multiple comparison test (f, g)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Adipocyte OGT drives diet-induced hyperphagia through transactivation of lipid desaturation in adipose tissue. a Gene expression analysis of de novo lipid desaturation and synthesis in adipose tissue (Chow for 15 weeks, Con n = 8, FKO n = 8; age-matched HFD for 9 weeks, Con n = 5, FKO n = 6). b Protein levels of SCD and OGT in adipose tissue. c Western blotting analysis in adipose tissue from 9-week-HFD-fed FKO and Con mice (Con n = 5, FKO n = 6, two representative biological replicates were shown). d Growth curves and e energy intake of (m)HFD-fed Con and FKO mice (n = 8–10 per group). mHFD denotes a mono-unsaturated fat-fortified high-fat diet that changes the saturated fat-rich soybean oil fraction into the mono-unsaturated fat-rich canola oil as illustrated in the diagram (d). f Contents of palmitate (C16:0) and palmitoleate (C16:1) DAG in adipose lipidome, and circulating levels of leptin (g), or of FGF21 (h) in mice fed HFD or mHFD for 15 weeks. Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m. n.s. not significant, *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, ****P < 0.0001, post hoc Sidak’s tests (a, eh), or #P< 0.01 HFD Con vs. HFD FKO, two-tailed Student’s t-test (a). A dashed line in (eh) indicates that data from HFD study and mHFD study are presented in a side-by-side manner, and inference may not be made between different diets
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Adipose tissue endocannabinoid metabolism mediates the appetite-inducing effect of OGT. a Heatmap of N-acylethanolamine (NAE) profiles in adipose tissue (pgWAT) and serum from mice (n = 8 per group) fed HFD or mHFD for 14–15 weeks. Data has been processed to follow Gaussian distribution. Each box represents the log2 ratio of FKO/WT. b, c Levels of AEA in adipose tissue (b) and serum (c) from mice described above. d Energy intake of mice (n = 15 or 11) fed HFD for 10–13 weeks and dosed with FAAH inhibitor URB597 (0.5 mg/kg). n.s. not significant, *P< 0.05, multiple t-tests adjusted by the Holm–Sidak method. e Energy intake of mice (n = 11 or 10) fed HFD for 12–14 weeks and dosed with CB1 agonist ACEA (1 mg/kg). Mice were dosed at 8:30–9:00 a.m., and measured at indicated time points. n.s. not significant, *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, repeat-measure post hoc Sidak’s tests. f Energy intake of mice (n = 7 per group) fed HFD for 13 weeks dosed with peripheral CB1 receptor blocker AM 6545 as indicated. Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m. n.s. not significant, *P < 0.05, **P< 0.01, ****P< 0.0001, post hoc Sidak’s tests, or #P< 0.05, two-tailed Student’s t-test. g Food intake (% pre-injection baseline) of mice (n = 11 or 10) fed HFD for 10–11 weeks and dosed with CB1 antagonist AM 6545 (3.5 mg/kg). **P< 0.01, repeat-measure post hoc Sidak’s tests. A dashed line in (b, c) indicates that data from HFD study and mHFD study are presented in a side-by-side manner, and inference may not be made between different diets
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
A working model for appetite regulation in obesity. The fat-sensing adipose tissue-to-brain axis induces hyperphagia when palatable foods are available. This appetite-inducing axis in adipose tissue is activated by the fat-sensing module OGT, which trans-activates expression of the lipid desaturation module SCD. SCD facilitates the accumulation of the appetite-inducing module AEA, which activates peripheral CB1 signaling to induce hyperphagia

References

    1. Ochner CN, Barrios DM, Lee CD, Pi-Sunyer FX. Biological mechanisms that promote weight regain following weight loss in obese humans. Physiol. Behav. 2013;120:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.07.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leibel RL, et al. Biologic responses to weight loss and weight regain: report from an American Diabetes Association Research Symposium. Diabetes. 2015;64:2299–2309. doi: 10.2337/db15-0004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dietrich MO, Horvath TL. Limitations in anti-obesity drug development: the critical role of hunger-promoting neurons. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2012;11:675–691. doi: 10.1038/nrd3739. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dietrich MO, et al. Agrp neurons mediate Sirt1’s action on the melanocortin system and energy balance: roles for Sirt1 in neuronal firing and synaptic plasticity. J. Neurosci.: Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2010;30:11815–11825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2234-10.2010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cota D, et al. Hypothalamic mTOR signaling regulates food intake. Science. 2006;312:927–930. doi: 10.1126/science.1124147. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types