Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov 16:9:2602.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02602. eCollection 2018.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Autoimmune Diseases: From Mechanistic Insights to Biomarkers

Affiliations
Review

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Autoimmune Diseases: From Mechanistic Insights to Biomarkers

Kelen Cristina Ribeiro Malmegrim et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Phase I/II clinical trials of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) have led to increased safety and efficacy of this therapy for severe and refractory autoimmune diseases (AD). Recent phase III randomized studies have demonstrated that AHSCT induces long-term disease remission in most patients without any further immunosuppression, with superior efficacy when compared to conventional treatments. Immune monitoring studies have revealed the regeneration of a self-tolerant T and B cell repertoire, enhancement of immune regulatory mechanisms, and changes toward an anti-inflammatory milieu in patients that are responsive to AHSCT. However, some patients reactivate the disease after transplantation due to reasons not yet completely understood. This scenario emphasizes that additional specific immunological interventions are still required to improve or sustain therapeutic efficacy of AHSCT in patients with AD. Here, we critically review the current knowledge about the operating immune mechanisms or established mechanistic biomarkers of AHSCT for AD. In addition, we suggest recommendations for future immune monitoring studies and biobanking to allow discovery and development of biomarkers. In our view, AHSCT for AD has entered a new era and researchers of this field should work to identify robust predictive, prognostic, treatment-response biomarkers and to establish new guidelines for immune monitoring studies and combined therapeutic interventions to further improve the AHSCT protocols and their therapeutic efficacy.

Keywords: autoimmune diseases; biomarkers; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; immune reconstitution; immune tolerance; immunoregulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Future directions for establishment of biomarkers of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases. Patients with autoimmune disease (AD) must be are selected to undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Based on the clinical, laboratory and immune monitoring results, patients will be classified in “responsive” or “non-responsive” to AHSCT. Well-performed immune monitoring evaluations are essential to settle mechanistic biomarkers and reveal new prognostic, predictor and/or response to treatment biomarkers. Further, additional therapeutic interventions can be proposed to treat patients who do not respond sufficiently to transplantation as a single treatment or reactivate the disease after some period of remission. New approaches for improving AHSCT efficacy in AD patients and/or combined immunotherapies are warranted.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Swart JF, Delemarre EM, van Wijk F, Boelens J, Kuball J, van Laar JM, et al. . Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2017) 13:244–56. 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muraro PA, Martin R, Mancardi GL, Nicholas R, Sormani MP, Saccardi R. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. (2017) 13:391–405. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.81 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burt RK, Shah SJ, Dill K, Grant T, Gheorghiade M, Schroeder J, et al. . Autologous non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation compared with pulse cyclophosphamide once per month for systemic sclerosis (ASSIST): an open-label, randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet (2011) 378:498–506. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60982-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burt RK, Oliveira MC, Shah SJ, Moraes DA, Simoes B, Gheorghiade M, et al. . Cardiac involvement and treatment-related mortality after non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation with unselected autologous peripheral blood for patients with systemic sclerosis: a retrospective analysis. Lancet (2013) 381:1116–24. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62114-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Laar JM, Farge D, Sont JK, Naraghi K, Marjanovic Z, Larghero J, et al. . Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation vs intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. JAMA (2014) 311:2490–8. 10.1001/jama.2014.6368 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types