Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov;10(Suppl 30):S3573-S3577.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.66.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated surgical bioprostheses

Affiliations
Review

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated surgical bioprostheses

Dale J Murdoch et al. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) procedures are less invasive than re-do open heart surgery, and have proven relatively safe and effective. In large multicentre registries morbidity and mortality risks are generally lower than with surgery, and improvement in quality of life can be profound. Outcomes continue to improve with advances in transcatheter heart valve (THV) technology, techniques, and expertise. However specific concerns remain; including residual stenosis, coronary obstruction, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and thrombosis. The unknown durability is a concern in patients with the potential for longevity. Transcatheter VIV procedures will likely increasingly be favoured over reoperation when bioprosthetic heart valves fail, particularly when surgical risks are high.

Keywords: Valve-in-valve (VIV); aortic valve; aortic valve replacement; transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: JG Webb: Consultant- Edwards Lifesciences. Another author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R (left) and Edwards SAPIEN 3 (right) THVs deployed within bioprosthetic aortic valves. THVs, transcatheter heart valves.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recommended positioning of the SAPIEN 3 valve in the aortic position (left) and mitral position (right).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paradis JM, Del Trigo M, Puri R, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring for treating aortic and mitral surgical prosthetic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2019-37. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thourani VH, Suri RM, Gunter RL, et al. Contemporary real-world outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in 141,905 low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;99:55-61. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Webb JG. Transcatheter valve in valve implants for failed prosthetic valves. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:765-6. 10.1002/ccd.21379 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wenaweser P, Buellesfeld L, Gerckens U, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: the first valve in valve procedure using the Corevalve Revalving system. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;70:760-4. 10.1002/ccd.21300 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christakis GT, Buth KJ, Goldman BS, et al. Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1198-203. 10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00758-9 - DOI - PubMed