Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;9(5):785-790.
doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.06.03.

Endoscopic stenting should be advocated in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer presenting with acute obstruction

Affiliations

Endoscopic stenting should be advocated in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer presenting with acute obstruction

Tian-Zhi Lim et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Background: It remains contentious whether endoscopic stenting or upfront surgery is more optimal in patients with metastatic colorectal cancers presenting with large bowel obstruction.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who underwent either endoscopic stenting or emergency surgery for acute large bowel obstruction was performed.

Results: Between January 2007 and June 2014, 66 patients, median age, 64 (range, 25-96) years, presented with acute large bowel obstruction from metastatic colorectal cancer. Forty (60.6%) patients underwent endoscopic stenting whilst the rest received immediate upfront surgical intervention. Of the 40 patients, 29 (72.5%) were successfully stented. The remaining 11 (27.5%) patients who failed endoscopic stenting required immediate emergency surgery to relieve the obstruction. Patients who failed endoscopic stenting had worse complications than those patients who had their stents successfully inserted [odds ratio (OR), 23.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.29-250.00, P=0.004]. Patients who underwent emergency surgery had a longer median length of stay than patients who had successful endoscopic stenting (P=0.003). The patients that underwent successful stenting had earlier commencement of chemotherapy compared to those who had upfront surgery (P=0.02). There was no difference in stoma creation rates between patients who had emergency surgery versus those who were successfully stented.

Conclusions: Stenting is a safe option in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer presenting with acute large bowel obstruction. Earlier commencement of chemotherapy occurs in patients who were successfully stented. Patients who failed stenting have equivalent outcomes to those who undergone upfront emergency surgery.

Keywords: Metastatic; colorectal cancer; stenting; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan Meier curve showing survival between patients who were successfully stented and those who underwent emergency upfront surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deans GT, Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST. Malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg 1994;81:1270-6. 10.1002/bjs.1800810905 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abbott S, Eglinton TW, Ma Y, et al. Predictors of outcome in palliative colonic stent placement for malignant obstruction. Br J Surg 2014;101:121-6. 10.1002/bjs.9340 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan CJ, Dasari BV, Gardiner K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 2012;99:469-76. 10.1002/bjs.8689 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lim TZ, Chan D, Tan KK. Patients who failed endoscopic stenting for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction suffered the worst outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:1267-73. 10.1007/s00384-014-1948-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liang J, Church JM, Stocchi L, et al. Should bypass or stoma creation be undertaken for unresectable stage IV colorectal carcinoma? ANZ J Surg 2014;84:275-9. 10.1111/ans.12267 - DOI - PubMed