Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep;7(5):690-697.
doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.09.06.

How I deploy arterial grafts

Affiliations
Review

How I deploy arterial grafts

David P Taggart. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

There are currently around one million coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures performed worldwide annually and despite two decades of evidence to support the use of a second arterial graft, if not total arterial grafting, the stark reality is that in contemporary practice 80% of all grafts used for CABG are saphenous vein grafts (SVG). The following description of how I deploy arterial grafts has been developed over more than two decades of clinical practice and largely self-taught by a process of "trial and error" and most importantly dictated by "ease of use" rather than personal robust angiographic data of long-term patency (although there is other such existing data in the literature for some of these techniques). The fact that there are numerous potential variants of deploying multiple arterial grafts underpins the fact that there is no single operation that is ideal in every patient-it is not a case of "one size fits all" as would be the situation for the use of a single internal thoracic artery (ITA) and supplemental vein grafts.

Keywords: Internal thoracic artery (ITA); coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); off-pump; radial artery (RA).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Prof. DP Taggart has received research funding, speaking and travelling honoraria from Medistim (Oslo) and is the Principle Investigator for the REQUEST Registry (funded by Medistim).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Skeletonized harvest of the ITA. ITA, internal thoracic artery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In situ RITA to LAD and LITA to circumflex system. RITA, right internal thoracic artery; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LAD, left anterior descending.
Figure 3
Figure 3
LITA to an obtuse marginal with a composite RITA as a free graft to the LAD. RITA, right internal thoracic artery; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LAD, left anterior descending.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Composite sequential RITA from LITA. RITA, right internal thoracic artery; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LAD, left anterior descending.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Composite RITA from lateral wall of LITA with additional “T graft”. RITA, right internal thoracic artery; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LAD, left anterior descending.
Figure 6
Figure 6
LITA to LAD, RITA through the transverse sinus to the obtuse marginal. RITA, right internal thoracic artery; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LAD, left anterior descending; RA, radial artery; SVG, saphenous vein graft.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Radial artery from aorta to PDA. PDA, posterior descending artery.
Figure 8
Figure 8
In situ RITA with extension by radial artery. RITA, right internal thoracic artery; PDA, posterior descending artery.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Sequential saphenous vein graft on the inferior wall of the heart. LV, left ventricular; RCA, right coronary artery; SVG, saphenous vein graft; PDA, posterior descending artery.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Use of a gastroepiploic artery (GEA) for the inferior wall. RITA, right internal thoracic artery; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; PDA, posterior descending artery; OM, obtuse marginal coronary artery; LAD, left anterior descending.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Radial artery jump graft from distal LAD to proximally occluded PDA. RITA, right internal thoracic artery; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LAD, left anterior descending; PDA, posterior descending artery.

References

    1. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 2001;358:870-5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06069-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiss AJ, Zhao S, Tian DH, et al. A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013;2:390-400. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, et al. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation 2014;130:539-45. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004255 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buttar SN, Yan TD, Taggart DP, et al. Long-term and short-term outcomes of using bilateral internal mammary artery grafting versus left internal mammary artery grafting: a meta-analysis. Heart 2017;103:1419-26. 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310864 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. Randomized Trial of Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2540-9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021 - DOI - PubMed