Comparative quality-adjusted survival analysis between radiation therapy alone and radiation with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31 with novel decision analysis methods
- PMID: 30505816
- PMCID: PMC6251940
- DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2018.01.002
Comparative quality-adjusted survival analysis between radiation therapy alone and radiation with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer: a secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31 with novel decision analysis methods
Abstract
Background: Androgen deprivation therapy in addition to radiation therapy (RT + ADT) has shown benefits in local control and progression-free survival compared with RT alone for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 85-31. However, the survival gain may be diluted with increased toxicity of ADT. The aim of the study is to compare quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) values between two groups.
Methods: We developed "quality-adjusted survival analysis using duration" (QASAD) and "quality-adjusted survival analysis using probability" (QASAP) to estimate the quality-adjusted survival time. The QASAD uses the median duration in each health state to weight the utilities, whereas the QASAP uses the proportional probability of being in each state for weighting. The survival and complication rates were reconstructed based on published Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and the utility values for states were obtained from the previous literature.
Results: QALYs values for RT + ADT were generally higher than those for RT. The QASAD resulted in a QALY value of 4.93 [95% bootstrapped confidence interval (CI) = 4.12-5.71] for RT and of 5.60 (95% CI = 4.30-6.48) for RT + ADT. QASAP resulted in a QALY value of 4.85 (95% CI = 4.16-5.39) for RT and 4.96 (95% CI = 3.73-5.78) for RT + ADT.
Conclusions: We showed that RT + ADT provided slightly better quality-adjusted survival outcome than RT alone. The QASAD and QASAP methods may help the decision of optimal treatment balancing between survival gain and unfavorable quality of life.
Keywords: Decision support techniques; Quality of life; Quality-adjusted life years; Quality-adjusted survival analysis; Survival analysis.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The need for androgen deprivation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy.Can J Urol. 2017 Feb;24(1):8656-8662. Can J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28263132
-
Improved Survival With Prostate Radiation in Addition to Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Men With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2835-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4788. Epub 2016 Jun 20. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27325855
-
Economic analysis of a phase III clinical trial evaluating the addition of total androgen suppression to radiation versus radiation alone for locally advanced prostate cancer (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 86-10).Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 1;63(3):788-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.010. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005. PMID: 16109464 Clinical Trial.
-
Benefits and Risks of Primary Treatments for High-risk Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Systematic Review.Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):614-627. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.01.033. Epub 2020 Mar 4. Eur Urol. 2020. PMID: 32146018
-
Multimodal therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: the roles of radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and their combination.Radiat Oncol J. 2017 Sep;35(3):189-197. doi: 10.3857/roj.2017.00318. Epub 2017 Sep 29. Radiat Oncol J. 2017. PMID: 29037021 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Establishment of the Seoul National University Prospectively Enrolled Registry for Genitourinary Cancer (SUPER-GUC): A prospective, multidisciplinary, bio-bank linked cohort and research platform.Investig Clin Urol. 2019 Jul;60(4):235-243. doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.4.235. Epub 2019 May 20. Investig Clin Urol. 2019. PMID: 31294132 Free PMC article.
-
Androgen deprivation therapy may reduce the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with prostate cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study.Prostate Int. 2021 Dec;9(4):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 29. Prostate Int. 2021. PMID: 35059357 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal PSA Threshold for Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy and Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.Yonsei Med J. 2020 Aug;61(8):652-659. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.8.652. Yonsei Med J. 2020. PMID: 32734728 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lawton C.A., Winter K., Murray K., Machtay M., Mesic J.B., Hanks G.E. Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85-31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49:937–946. - PubMed
-
- Pilepich M.V., Winter K., John M.J., Mesic J.B., Sause W., Rubin P. Phase III radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:1243–1252. - PubMed
-
- Konski A., Sherman E., Krahn M., Bremner K., Beck J.R., Watkins-Bruner D. Economic analysis of a phase III clinical trial evaluating the addition of total androgen suppression to radiation versus radiation alone for locally advanced prostate cancer (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 86-10) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:788–794. - PubMed
-
- Konski A., Watkins-Bruner D., Brereton H., Feigenberg S., Hanks G. Long-term hormone therapy and radiation is cost-effective for patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106:51–57. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources